PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EATVX vs. NPRTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EATVX vs. NPRTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund (EATVX) and Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund (NPRTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EATVX having a 17.94% return and NPRTX slightly higher at 18.61%. Over the past 10 years, EATVX has underperformed NPRTX with an annualized return of 12.15%, while NPRTX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.23% annualized return.


EATVX

1D
-1.68%
1M
3.52%
YTD
17.94%
6M
16.76%
1Y
30.35%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*
12.15%

NPRTX

1D
-1.26%
1M
1.75%
YTD
18.61%
6M
17.45%
1Y
35.49%
3Y*
16.94%
5Y*
10.00%
10Y*
14.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EATVX vs. NPRTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EATVX
Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund
17.94%12.86%14.37%9.44%-9.77%25.92%4.39%29.73%-5.98%17.65%
NPRTX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund
18.61%20.69%10.92%-1.76%-1.25%28.12%14.44%23.96%-1.23%13.45%

Correlation

The correlation between EATVX and NPRTX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 1999

0.91

The correlation between EATVX and NPRTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EATVX vs. NPRTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EATVX
EATVX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EATVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EATVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EATVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
EATVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
EATVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

NPRTX
NPRTX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
NPRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NPRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
NPRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NPRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NPRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EATVX vs. NPRTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund (EATVX) and Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund (NPRTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EATVXNPRTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.56

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

5.22

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.87

21.18

-4.31

EATVX vs. NPRTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EATVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the NPRTX Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EATVX and NPRTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EATVX vs. NPRTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EATVX drawdown since its inception was -53.01%, smaller than the maximum NPRTX drawdown of -66.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EATVX and NPRTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EATVXNPRTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.01%

-66.25%

+13.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.03%

-7.03%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.74%

-13.79%

-4.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.70%

-19.82%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.63%

-39.01%

+0.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-1.58%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.17%

-9.25%

+1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.73%

+0.15%

Volatility

EATVX vs. NPRTX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund (EATVX) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund (NPRTX) at 4.46%. This indicates that EATVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NPRTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EATVXNPRTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

4.46%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

9.58%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.27%

11.78%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.21%

14.12%

+1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.57%

17.53%

+0.04%

EATVX vs. NPRTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EATVX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than NPRTX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

EATVX vs. NPRTX - Dividend Comparison

EATVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, less than NPRTX's 5.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EATVX
Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund
3.53%4.16%3.75%3.24%2.17%4.50%1.29%1.13%1.57%0.95%1.10%8.71%
NPRTX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund
5.42%6.42%2.19%2.45%1.56%5.04%1.60%3.87%14.44%8.55%3.58%9.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, EATVX and NPRTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EATVX has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to NPRTX (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EATVX dropped -53.01% vs NPRTX's -66.25%.

NPRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EATVX and NPRTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer