EATVX vs. FLCOX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

EATVX (Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund) and FLCOX (Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, EATVX returned 10.02%/yr vs 10.52%/yr for FLCOX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EATVX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FLCOX.

Performance

EATVX vs. FLCOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund (EATVX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EATVX achieves a 16.27% return, which is significantly higher than FLCOX's 15.07% return.

EATVX

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 2.92%
• YTD: 16.27%
• 6M: 17.23%
• 1Y: 31.67%
• 3Y*: 18.01%
• 5Y*: 10.02%
• 10Y*: 11.64%

FLCOX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 2.76%
• YTD: 15.07%
• 6M: 15.56%
• 1Y: 30.00%
• 3Y*: 19.02%
• 5Y*: 10.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EATVX vs. FLCOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EATVX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund	16.27%	12.86%	14.37%	9.44%	-9.77%	25.92%	4.39%	29.73%	-5.98%	16.77%
FLCOX Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund	15.07%	15.90%	14.38%	11.48%	-7.57%	25.09%	2.87%	26.54%	-8.38%	10.90%

Correlation

The correlation between EATVX and FLCOX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.97

The correlation between EATVX and FLCOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EATVX vs. FLCOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EATVX

EATVX Risk / Return Rank: 84
EATVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
EATVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
EATVX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
EATVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
EATVX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

FLCOX

FLCOX Risk / Return Rank: 86
FLCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FLCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FLCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FLCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FLCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EATVX vs. FLCOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund (EATVX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EATVX	FLCOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.73	2.76	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.85	3.90	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.50	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.94	4.39	-0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.94	18.45	-1.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EATVX vs. FLCOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EATVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the FLCOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EATVX and FLCOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EATVX	FLCOX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.73	2.76	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	0.71	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.61	-0.14

Drawdowns

EATVX vs. FLCOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EATVX drawdown since its inception was -53.01%, which is greater than FLCOX's maximum drawdown of -38.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EATVX and FLCOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EATVX	FLCOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.01%	-38.28%	-14.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.03%	-6.80%	-1.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.74%	-15.60%	-3.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.70%	-19.00%	-1.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.18%	-4.45%	-3.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	1.62%	+0.24%

Volatility

EATVX vs. FLCOX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund (EATVX) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX) at 2.88%. This indicates that EATVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EATVX	FLCOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.53%	2.88%	+0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.89%	8.13%	+0.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.58%	10.81%	+0.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.13%	14.84%	+0.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.55%	17.63%	-0.08%

EATVX vs. FLCOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EATVX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCOX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

EATVX vs. FLCOX - Dividend Comparison

EATVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than FLCOX's 1.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EATVX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Value Fund	3.58%	4.16%	3.75%	3.24%	2.17%	4.50%	1.29%	1.13%	1.57%	0.95%	1.10%	8.71%
FLCOX Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund	1.31%	1.51%	1.92%	1.99%	2.01%	1.55%	2.28%	3.82%	2.79%	0.60%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EATVX and FLCOX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, EATVX and FLCOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EATVX or FLCOX?

EATVX has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to FLCOX (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EATVX dropped -53.01% vs FLCOX's -38.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLCOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.