EASCX vs. USMSX
EASCX (Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipal Income Fund) and USMSX (JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, EASCX returned 1.31%/yr vs 1.77%/yr for USMSX. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EASCX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for USMSX.
Performance
EASCX vs. USMSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EASCX achieves a 2.48% return, which is significantly higher than USMSX's 0.82% return.
EASCX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 2.48%
- 6M
- 3.03%
- 1Y
- 8.14%
- 3Y*
- 4.17%
- 5Y*
- 1.31%
- 10Y*
- 2.02%
USMSX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- 1Y
- 2.45%
- 3Y*
- 2.93%
- 5Y*
- 1.77%
- 10Y*
- —
EASCX vs. USMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EASCX Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipal Income Fund | 2.48% | 4.43% | 2.57% | 4.47% | -7.16% | 0.83% | 4.61% | 6.11% | 2.02% | 2.89% |
USMSX JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund | 0.82% | 2.87% | 3.09% | 3.21% | -0.90% | -0.15% | 0.77% | 1.90% | 1.01% | 0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between EASCX and USMSX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.32 |
The correlation between EASCX and USMSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EASCX vs. USMSX — Risk / Return Rank
EASCX
USMSX
EASCX vs. USMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipal Income Fund (EASCX) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund (USMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EASCX | USMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | 4.78 | -3.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 8.25 | -5.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.06 | 44.52 | -33.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EASCX vs. USMSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EASCX drawdown since its inception was -29.70%, which is greater than USMSX's maximum drawdown of -2.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EASCX and USMSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EASCX | USMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.70% | -2.09% | -27.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.63% | -0.30% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.70% | -0.50% | -5.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.21% | -2.03% | -9.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.48% | -0.22% | -2.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.74% | 0.06% | +0.68% |
Volatility
EASCX vs. USMSX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipal Income Fund (EASCX) has a higher volatility of 0.77% compared to JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund (USMSX) at 0.18%. This indicates that EASCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EASCX | USMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.77% | 0.18% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.19% | 0.45% | +1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.93% | 0.59% | +2.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.80% | 0.71% | +3.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.53% | 0.73% | +2.80% |
EASCX vs. USMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EASCX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than USMSX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
EASCX vs. USMSX - Dividend Comparison
EASCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than USMSX's 2.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EASCX Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipal Income Fund | 3.40% | 4.37% | 4.06% | 2.69% | 2.03% | 1.68% | 2.24% | 3.08% | 3.09% | 3.09% | 3.25% | 3.61% |
USMSX JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.84% | 2.35% | 0.70% | 0.05% | 0.57% | 1.28% | 1.01% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EASCX and USMSX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EASCX has higher volatility (0.77%) compared to USMSX (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EASCX dropped -29.70% vs USMSX's -2.09%.
USMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.15 vs 2.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EASCX and USMSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer