PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EASCX vs. ATOIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EASCX vs. ATOIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipal Income Fund (EASCX) and abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund (ATOIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EASCX achieves a 2.48% return, which is significantly higher than ATOIX's 1.01% return. Over the past 10 years, EASCX has outperformed ATOIX with an annualized return of 2.02%, while ATOIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.79% annualized return.


EASCX

1D
0.12%
1M
1.80%
YTD
2.48%
6M
3.03%
1Y
8.14%
3Y*
4.17%
5Y*
1.31%
10Y*
2.02%

ATOIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
1.01%
6M
1.54%
1Y
3.02%
3Y*
3.08%
5Y*
2.30%
10Y*
1.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EASCX vs. ATOIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EASCX
Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipal Income Fund
2.48%4.43%2.57%4.47%-7.16%0.83%4.61%6.11%2.02%2.89%
ATOIX
abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund
1.01%3.33%3.14%3.27%0.87%-0.04%0.88%1.40%1.54%2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between EASCX and ATOIX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2002

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EASCX vs. ATOIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EASCX
EASCX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
EASCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EASCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
EASCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EASCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
EASCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

ATOIX
ATOIX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ATOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
ATOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EASCX vs. ATOIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipal Income Fund (EASCX) and abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund (ATOIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EASCXATOIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-12.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

10.98

-9.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

30.48

-27.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.06

89.66

-78.61

EASCX vs. ATOIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EASCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the ATOIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EASCX and ATOIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EASCX vs. ATOIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EASCX drawdown since its inception was -29.70%, which is greater than ATOIX's maximum drawdown of -1.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EASCX and ATOIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EASCXATOIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.70%

-1.46%

-28.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.63%

-0.10%

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.70%

-0.10%

-5.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.21%

-0.37%

-10.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.21%

-0.43%

-10.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.48%

-0.06%

-2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.74%

0.03%

+0.71%

Volatility

EASCX vs. ATOIX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipal Income Fund (EASCX) has a higher volatility of 0.77% compared to abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund (ATOIX) at 0.20%. This indicates that EASCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATOIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EASCXATOIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

0.20%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.19%

0.61%

+1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93%

0.87%

+2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.80%

0.83%

+2.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.53%

0.79%

+2.74%

EASCX vs. ATOIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EASCX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ATOIX's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

EASCX vs. ATOIX - Dividend Comparison

EASCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than ATOIX's 2.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATOIX
abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund
2.98%3.27%3.09%3.02%1.07%0.06%0.88%1.39%1.42%2.20%0.61%0.52%
EASCX
Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipal Income Fund
3.40%4.37%4.06%2.69%2.03%1.68%2.24%3.08%3.09%3.09%3.25%3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


EASCX and ATOIX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EASCX has higher volatility (0.77%) compared to ATOIX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EASCX dropped -29.70% vs ATOIX's -1.46%.

ATOIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 2.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EASCX and ATOIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer