EASCX vs. MIY

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

EASCX (Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipal Income Fund) and MIY (BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, EASCX returned 2.02%/yr vs 2.48%/yr for MIY. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EASCX charges 0.65%/yr vs 2.25%/yr for MIY.

Performance

EASCX vs. MIY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipal Income Fund (EASCX) and BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund (MIY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EASCX achieves a 2.48% return, which is significantly lower than MIY's 5.87% return. Over the past 10 years, EASCX has underperformed MIY with an annualized return of 2.02%, while MIY has yielded a comparatively higher 2.48% annualized return.

EASCX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 1.80%
• YTD: 2.48%
• 6M: 3.03%
• 1Y: 8.14%
• 3Y*: 4.17%
• 5Y*: 1.31%
• 10Y*: 2.02%

MIY

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 1.20%
• YTD: 5.87%
• 6M: 6.50%
• 1Y: 16.13%
• 3Y*: 8.91%
• 5Y*: 0.27%
• 10Y*: 2.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EASCX vs. MIY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EASCX Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipal Income Fund	2.48%	4.43%	2.57%	4.47%	-7.16%	0.83%	4.61%	6.11%	2.02%	2.89%
MIY BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund	5.87%	11.24%	3.48%	6.60%	-24.10%	10.04%	7.27%	19.51%	-6.71%	8.86%

Correlation

The correlation between EASCX and MIY is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 1994	0.26

The correlation between EASCX and MIY shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.47 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EASCX vs. MIY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EASCX

EASCX Risk / Return Rank: 82
EASCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
EASCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
EASCX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
EASCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
EASCX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

MIY

MIY Risk / Return Rank: 26
MIY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
MIY Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
MIY Omega Ratio Rank: 31
MIY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
MIY Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EASCX vs. MIY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipal Income Fund (EASCX) and BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund (MIY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EASCX	MIY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	1.38	+1.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.60	2.10	+2.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.72	1.27	+0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.10	1.61	+1.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.06	5.30	+5.75

EASCX vs. MIY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EASCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the MIY Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EASCX and MIY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EASCX vs. MIY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EASCX drawdown since its inception was -29.70%, smaller than the maximum MIY drawdown of -42.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EASCX and MIY.

Drawdown Indicators

	EASCX	MIY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.70%	-42.19%	+12.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.63%	-10.08%	+7.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.70%	-14.72%	+9.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.21%	-34.59%	+23.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-11.21%	-34.59%	+23.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.68%	+3.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.48%	-8.31%	+5.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.74%	3.05%	-2.31%

Volatility

EASCX vs. MIY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipal Income Fund (EASCX) is 0.77%, while BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund (MIY) has a volatility of 2.64%. This indicates that EASCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EASCX	MIY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.77%	2.64%	-1.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.19%	10.44%	-8.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.93%	11.76%	-8.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.80%	11.67%	-7.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.53%	11.97%	-8.44%

EASCX vs. MIY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EASCX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than MIY's 2.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

EASCX vs. MIY - Dividend Comparison

EASCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than MIY's 5.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EASCX Eaton Vance South Carolina Municipal Income Fund	3.40%	4.37%	4.06%	2.69%	2.03%	1.68%	2.24%	3.08%	3.09%	3.09%	3.25%	3.61%
MIY BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund	5.40%	5.57%	5.21%	3.86%	5.70%	4.38%	4.23%	4.27%	5.27%	5.46%	5.85%	5.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EASCX and MIY in my portfolio?

EASCX and MIY have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EASCX or MIY?

MIY has higher volatility (2.64%) compared to EASCX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EASCX dropped -29.70% vs MIY's -42.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EASCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.