PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAPR vs. XDEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EAPR vs. XDEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December (XDEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EAPR vs. XDEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EAPR
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April
0.61%14.80%2.86%8.19%-5.01%1.38%
XDEC
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December
-1.49%9.71%9.61%14.37%-3.38%1.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAPR achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly higher than XDEC's -1.49% return.


EAPR

1D
-0.97%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
0.61%
6M
2.49%
1Y
12.59%
3Y*
6.93%
5Y*
10Y*

XDEC

1D
1.60%
1M
-2.03%
YTD
-1.49%
6M
0.53%
1Y
9.55%
3Y*
8.90%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EAPR vs. XDEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAPR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEC's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EAPR vs. XDEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAPR
EAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
EAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEC
XDEC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAPR vs. XDEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December (XDEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EAPRXDECDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.64

1.00

+0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.39

1.50

+0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.29

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

1.29

+0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.21

7.71

+5.50

EAPR vs. XDEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAPR Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the XDEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAPR and XDEC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EAPRXDECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

1.00

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.81

-0.46

Correlation

The correlation between EAPR and XDEC is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EAPR vs. XDEC - Dividend Comparison

Neither EAPR nor XDEC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

EAPR vs. XDEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAPR drawdown since its inception was -17.65%, which is greater than XDEC's maximum drawdown of -11.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAPR and XDEC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EAPRXDECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.65%

-11.75%

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.99%

-7.62%

+0.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-2.37%

+1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.18%

-1.71%

-2.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

1.28%

-0.34%

Volatility

EAPR vs. XDEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) is 1.23%, while FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December (XDEC) has a volatility of 2.94%. This indicates that EAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EAPRXDECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

2.94%

-1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.42%

3.92%

-1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.73%

9.61%

-1.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.82%

8.60%

+1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.82%

8.60%

+1.22%