EAPR vs. UXJL

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EAPR (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April) and UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. EAPR is passively managed, while UXJL is actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EAPR charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UXJL.

Performance

EAPR vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAPR achieves a 11.89% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 12.64% return.

EAPR

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 2.45%
• YTD: 11.89%
• 6M: 12.71%
• 1Y: 22.51%
• 3Y*: 10.78%
• 5Y*: 5.35%
• 10Y*: —

UXJL

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 6.17%
• YTD: 12.64%
• 6M: 12.74%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAPR vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EAPR Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April	11.89%	4.89%
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July	12.64%	9.31%

Correlation

The correlation between EAPR and UXJL is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025	0.58

Return for Risk

EAPR vs. UXJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAPR

EAPR Risk / Return Rank: 95
EAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
EAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
EAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
EAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
EAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAPR vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EAPR	UXJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.13	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.38	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.87	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.54	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	43.49	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EAPR	UXJL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	1.96	-1.41

Drawdowns

EAPR vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAPR drawdown since its inception was -17.65%, which is greater than UXJL's maximum drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAPR and UXJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	EAPR	UXJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.65%	-10.29%	-7.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.02%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.65%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.07%	-1.52%	-2.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.52%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EAPR	UXJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.75%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.25%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.22%	13.91%	-6.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.09%	13.91%	-3.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.02%	13.91%	-3.89%

EAPR vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAPR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

EAPR vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither EAPR nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EAPR and UXJL in my portfolio?

EAPR and UXJL have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EAPR or UXJL?

On fees, UXJL is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EAPR or UXJL?

UXJL is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EAPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EAPR or UXJL?

EAPR and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between EAPR and UXJL?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EAPR and 0.85% for UXJL.