PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAOR vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EAOR vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOR achieves a 7.50% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 10.85% return.


EAOR

1D
-0.65%
1M
3.41%
YTD
7.50%
6M
7.84%
1Y
19.56%
3Y*
13.83%
5Y*
6.41%
10Y*

IVV

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.97%
YTD
10.85%
6M
10.87%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
22.43%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*
15.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAOR vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EAOR
iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF
7.50%15.59%10.69%14.96%-16.66%10.51%15.00%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
10.85%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%21.54%

Correlation

The correlation between EAOR and IVV is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020

0.93

The correlation between EAOR and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

EAOR vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EAOR
IVV

Technology

22.3%
35.6%

Financial Services

10.3%
11.8%

Industrials

6.8%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
10.1%

Communication Services

5.6%
11.2%

Healthcare

5.2%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
4.9%

Energy

2.3%
3.5%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Utilities

1.7%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.2%
1.9%

Technology

EAOR
22.3%
IVV
35.6%

Financial Services

EAOR
10.3%
IVV
11.8%

Industrials

EAOR
6.8%
IVV
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EAOR
5.8%
IVV
10.1%

Communication Services

EAOR
5.6%
IVV
11.2%

Healthcare

EAOR
5.2%
IVV
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

EAOR
2.8%
IVV
4.9%

Energy

EAOR
2.3%
IVV
3.5%

Basic Materials

EAOR
1.8%
IVV
1.8%

Utilities

EAOR
1.7%
IVV
2.4%

Real Estate

EAOR
1.2%
IVV
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EAOR vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOR
EAOR Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EAOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOR Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOR Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOR vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EAORIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.43

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

3.17

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.04

14.71

-1.67

EAOR vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAOR Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOR and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EAORIVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.39

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.83

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.45

+0.42

Drawdowns

EAOR vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOR drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOR and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EAORIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.91%

-55.25%

+32.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.62%

-8.89%

+2.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.28%

-18.75%

+8.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

-24.53%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-0.76%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-10.78%

+5.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

1.91%

-0.41%

Volatility

EAOR vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) have volatilities of 2.79% and 2.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EAORIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

2.87%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.90%

8.90%

-2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.55%

11.80%

-3.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.52%

16.88%

-6.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.39%

18.05%

-7.66%

EAOR vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOR has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EAOR vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

EAOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than IVV's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EAOR
iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF
2.34%2.45%2.52%2.39%1.99%1.39%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.06%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, EAOR and IVV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IVV has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to EAOR (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOR dropped -22.91% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 5-year performance, IVV leads with 13.88% vs 6.41% for EAOR. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IVV has performed better with a 13.88% return vs 6.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EAOR.

EAOR has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 1.06% for IVV.

EAOR is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while IVV is S&P 500. EAOR tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Growth Allocation Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOR and 0.03% for IVV.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAOR and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer