PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAOR vs. AAAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EAOR vs. AAAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) and Amplius Aggressive Asset Allocation ETF (AAAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAOR achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly lower than AAAA's 13.54% return.


EAOR

1D
1.29%
1M
1.63%
6M
7.19%
YTD
8.99%
1Y
16.51%
3Y*
13.62%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.01%

AAAA

1D
1.79%
1M
2.26%
6M
11.46%
YTD
13.54%
1Y
23.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
23.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$369.85K$290.25K$192.74K
$101.16K$92.75K$68.31K

EAOR vs. AAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EAOR and AAAA is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025

0.96

The correlation between EAOR and AAAA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EAOR vs. AAAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EAOR
EAOR Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EAOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOR Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOR Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

AAAA
AAAA Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
AAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
AAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EAOR vs. AAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) and Amplius Aggressive Asset Allocation ETF (AAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EAORAAAADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.36

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

3.01

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.38

12.50

-2.12

EAOR vs. AAAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the AAAA Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOR and AAAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EAOR vs. AAAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOR drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, which is greater than AAAA's maximum drawdown of -7.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOR and AAAA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EAORAAAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.91%

-7.83%

-15.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.62%

-7.83%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.94%

-1.14%

-3.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.88%

-0.29%

Volatility

EAOR vs. AAAA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) is 2.97%, while Amplius Aggressive Asset Allocation ETF (AAAA) has a volatility of 3.79%. This indicates that EAOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EAORAAAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

3.79%

-0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.89%

9.99%

-2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.38%

12.03%

-2.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.66%

11.87%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.42%

11.87%

-1.45%

EAOR vs. AAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOR has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than AAAA's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

EAOR vs. AAAA - Dividend Comparison

EAOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than AAAA's 1.26% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
AAAA
Amplius Aggressive Asset Allocation ETF
1.26%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EAOR
iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF
2.34%2.45%2.52%2.39%1.99%1.39%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, EAOR and AAAA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AAAA has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to EAOR (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOR dropped -22.91% vs AAAA's -7.83%.

On 1-year performance, AAAA leads with 23.49% vs 16.51% for EAOR. On fees, EAOR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EAOR has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AAAA has performed better with a 23.49% return vs 16.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EAOR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AAAA.

EAOR has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 1.26% for AAAA.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amplius. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOR and 0.49% for AAAA.

AAAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAOR and AAAA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer