EAOK vs. YYY
EAOK (iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF) and YYY (Amplify CEF High Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds - EAOK tracks the BlackRock ESG Aware Conservative Allocation Index while YYY tracks the Nasdaq CEF High Income™ Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EAOK returned 3.20%/yr vs 2.92%/yr for YYY. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EAOK charges 0.18%/yr vs 3.23%/yr for YYY.
Performance
EAOK vs. YYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EAOK having a 3.85% return and YYY slightly lower at 3.82%.
EAOK
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 3.85%
- 6M
- 3.87%
- 1Y
- 12.25%
- 3Y*
- 8.79%
- 5Y*
- 3.20%
- 10Y*
- —
YYY
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- YTD
- 3.82%
- 6M
- 3.82%
- 1Y
- 11.25%
- 3Y*
- 12.56%
- 5Y*
- 2.92%
- 10Y*
- 5.57%
EAOK vs. YYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOK iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF | 3.85% | 11.47% | 5.81% | 10.13% | -14.92% | 4.32% | 8.01% |
YYY Amplify CEF High Income ETF | 3.82% | 13.08% | 11.86% | 12.98% | -21.78% | 14.13% | 15.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAOK and YYY is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020 | 0.70 |
The correlation between EAOK and YYY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
EAOK vs. YYY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EAOK
YYY
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
EAOK
YYY
Financial Services
EAOK
YYY
Industrials
EAOK
YYY
Consumer Cyclical
EAOK
YYY
Communication Services
EAOK
YYY
Healthcare
EAOK
YYY
Consumer Defensive
EAOK
YYY
Energy
EAOK
YYY
Basic Materials
EAOK
YYY
Utilities
EAOK
YYY
Real Estate
EAOK
YYY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAOK vs. YYY — Risk / Return Rank
EAOK
YYY
EAOK vs. YYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) and Amplify CEF High Income ETF (YYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EAOK | YYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.25 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 1.40 | +1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.14 | 6.19 | +5.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EAOK | YYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 1.32 | +0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.26 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.43 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
EAOK vs. YYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAOK drawdown since its inception was -19.91%, smaller than the maximum YYY drawdown of -42.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOK and YYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAOK | YYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.91% | -42.52% | +22.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.43% | -8.07% | +3.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.08% | -13.47% | +6.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.91% | -27.92% | +8.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -1.90% | +1.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.02% | -6.84% | +1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 1.82% | -0.81% |
Volatility
EAOK vs. YYY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) is 2.05%, while Amplify CEF High Income ETF (YYY) has a volatility of 2.46%. This indicates that EAOK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAOK | YYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.05% | 2.46% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.48% | 7.08% | -2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.49% | 8.56% | -3.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.04% | 11.36% | -4.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.83% | 13.90% | -7.07% |
EAOK vs. YYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
EAOK has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than YYY's 3.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
EAOK vs. YYY - Dividend Comparison
EAOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, less than YYY's 12.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOK iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF | 3.17% | 3.18% | 3.15% | 2.80% | 2.27% | 1.19% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YYY Amplify CEF High Income ETF | 12.70% | 12.51% | 12.50% | 12.39% | 12.36% | 9.08% | 9.79% | 9.10% | 9.73% | 8.16% | 10.34% | 10.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EAOK and YYY have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YYY has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to EAOK (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOK dropped -19.91% vs YYY's -42.52%.
On 5-year performance, EAOK leads with 3.20% vs 2.92% for YYY. On fees, EAOK is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EAOK has been the lower-risk option at 2.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EAOK has performed better with a 3.20% return vs 2.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EAOK is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 3.23% for YYY.
YYY has the higher dividend yield at 12.70%, compared with 3.17% for EAOK.
EAOK tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Conservative Allocation Index, while YYY tracks Nasdaq CEF High Income™ Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOK and 3.23% for YYY.
EAOK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EAOK and YYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer