PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAOK vs. YYY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EAOK vs. YYY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) and Amplify CEF High Income ETF (YYY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EAOK having a 3.85% return and YYY slightly lower at 3.82%.


EAOK

1D
-0.39%
1M
1.83%
YTD
3.85%
6M
3.87%
1Y
12.25%
3Y*
8.79%
5Y*
3.20%
10Y*

YYY

1D
-1.31%
1M
-0.45%
YTD
3.82%
6M
3.82%
1Y
11.25%
3Y*
12.56%
5Y*
2.92%
10Y*
5.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAOK vs. YYY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EAOK
iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF
3.85%11.47%5.81%10.13%-14.92%4.32%8.01%
YYY
Amplify CEF High Income ETF
3.82%13.08%11.86%12.98%-21.78%14.13%15.55%

Correlation

The correlation between EAOK and YYY is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020

0.70

The correlation between EAOK and YYY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

EAOK vs. YYY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EAOK
YYY

Technology

10.2%
10.2%

Financial Services

4.8%
24.6%

Industrials

3.2%
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

2.7%
3.2%

Communication Services

2.6%
3.3%

Healthcare

2.4%
17.1%

Consumer Defensive

1.3%
1.8%

Energy

1.1%
13.1%

Basic Materials

0.8%
1.3%

Utilities

0.8%
7.8%

Real Estate

0.6%
12.5%

Technology

EAOK
10.2%
YYY
10.2%

Financial Services

EAOK
4.8%
YYY
24.6%

Industrials

EAOK
3.2%
YYY
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

EAOK
2.7%
YYY
3.2%

Communication Services

EAOK
2.6%
YYY
3.3%

Healthcare

EAOK
2.4%
YYY
17.1%

Consumer Defensive

EAOK
1.3%
YYY
1.8%

Energy

EAOK
1.1%
YYY
13.1%

Basic Materials

EAOK
0.8%
YYY
1.3%

Utilities

EAOK
0.8%
YYY
7.8%

Real Estate

EAOK
0.6%
YYY
12.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EAOK vs. YYY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAOK
EAOK Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
EAOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOK Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOK Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

YYY
YYY Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
YYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
YYY Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
YYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
YYY Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAOK vs. YYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) and Amplify CEF High Income ETF (YYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EAOKYYYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.25

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

1.40

+1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.14

6.19

+5.95

EAOK vs. YYY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAOK Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the YYY Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAOK and YYY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EAOKYYYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

1.32

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.26

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.43

+0.22

Drawdowns

EAOK vs. YYY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAOK drawdown since its inception was -19.91%, smaller than the maximum YYY drawdown of -42.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOK and YYY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EAOKYYYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.91%

-42.52%

+22.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.43%

-8.07%

+3.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.08%

-13.47%

+6.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.91%

-27.92%

+8.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-1.90%

+1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.02%

-6.84%

+1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

1.82%

-0.81%

Volatility

EAOK vs. YYY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) is 2.05%, while Amplify CEF High Income ETF (YYY) has a volatility of 2.46%. This indicates that EAOK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EAOKYYYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.05%

2.46%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.48%

7.08%

-2.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.49%

8.56%

-3.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.04%

11.36%

-4.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.83%

13.90%

-7.07%

EAOK vs. YYY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAOK has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than YYY's 3.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

EAOK vs. YYY - Dividend Comparison

EAOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, less than YYY's 12.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EAOK
iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF
3.17%3.18%3.15%2.80%2.27%1.19%1.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YYY
Amplify CEF High Income ETF
12.70%12.51%12.50%12.39%12.36%9.08%9.79%9.10%9.73%8.16%10.34%10.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


EAOK and YYY have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YYY has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to EAOK (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOK dropped -19.91% vs YYY's -42.52%.

On 5-year performance, EAOK leads with 3.20% vs 2.92% for YYY. On fees, EAOK is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EAOK has been the lower-risk option at 2.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EAOK has performed better with a 3.20% return vs 2.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EAOK is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 3.23% for YYY.

YYY has the higher dividend yield at 12.70%, compared with 3.17% for EAOK.

EAOK tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Conservative Allocation Index, while YYY tracks Nasdaq CEF High Income™ Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOK and 3.23% for YYY.

EAOK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAOK and YYY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer