EAOK vs. SBIT
EAOK (iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EAOK is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the BlackRock ESG Aware Conservative Allocation Index, while SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EAOK returned 8.43% vs 98.77% for SBIT. Their -0.35 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. EAOK charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.
Performance
EAOK vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAOK achieves a 3.09% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 39.44% return.
EAOK
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 3.09%
- 1Y
- 8.43%
- 3Y*
- 8.07%
- 5Y*
- 2.74%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.17%
SBIT
- 1D
- 5.60%
- 1M
- -6.04%
- 6M
- 32.41%
- YTD
- 39.44%
- 1Y
- 98.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -42.65%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.40K | $12.79K | $19.89K | |
| $29.57M | $32.71M | $46.48M |
EAOK vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EAOK iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF | 3.09% | 11.47% | 4.41% |
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 39.44% | -25.11% | -73.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAOK and SBIT is -0.44, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024 | -0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAOK vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank
EAOK
SBIT
EAOK vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EAOK | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.23 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 2.35 | -0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.10 | 5.19 | +2.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EAOK vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAOK drawdown since its inception was -19.91%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOK and SBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAOK | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.91% | -91.35% | +71.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.43% | -47.94% | +43.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -77.87% | +76.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.91% | -69.07% | +64.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 21.67% | -20.61% |
Volatility
EAOK vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) is 1.73%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 18.09%. This indicates that EAOK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAOK | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.73% | 18.09% | -16.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.00% | 67.10% | -62.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.89% | 88.65% | -82.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.13% | 96.10% | -88.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.83% | 96.10% | -89.27% |
EAOK vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EAOK has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
EAOK vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison
EAOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, less than SBIT's 4.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOK iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF | 3.21% | 3.18% | 3.15% | 2.80% | 2.27% | 1.19% | 1.00% |
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 4.03% | 0.52% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EAOK and SBIT have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SBIT has higher volatility (18.09%) compared to EAOK (1.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAOK dropped -19.91% vs SBIT's -91.35%.
On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 98.77% vs 8.43% for EAOK. On fees, EAOK is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EAOK has been the lower-risk option at 1.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 98.77% return vs 8.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EAOK is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.
SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.03%, compared with 3.21% for EAOK.
EAOK is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. EAOK tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Conservative Allocation Index, while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOK and 0.95% for SBIT.
EAOK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EAOK and SBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer