EAOK vs. ASET
EAOK (iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF) and ASET (FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds - EAOK tracks the BlackRock ESG Aware Conservative Allocation Index while ASET tracks the Northern Trust Real Assets Allocation Total Return. Both are passively managed. EAOK charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for ASET.
Performance
EAOK vs. ASET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EAOK
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 3.85%
- 6M
- 3.87%
- 1Y
- 12.25%
- 3Y*
- 8.79%
- 5Y*
- 3.20%
- 10Y*
- —
ASET
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EAOK vs. ASET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EAOK iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF | 2.41% |
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund | 0.00% |
EAOK vs. ASET - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EAOK
ASET
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
EAOK
ASET
Financial Services
EAOK
ASET
-
Industrials
EAOK
ASET
Consumer Cyclical
EAOK
ASET
Communication Services
EAOK
ASET
Healthcare
EAOK
ASET
Consumer Defensive
EAOK
ASET
Energy
EAOK
ASET
Basic Materials
EAOK
ASET
Utilities
EAOK
ASET
Real Estate
EAOK
ASET
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAOK vs. ASET — Risk / Return Rank
EAOK
ASET
EAOK vs. ASET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF (EAOK) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EAOK | ASET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.14 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EAOK | ASET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | — | — |
Drawdowns
EAOK vs. ASET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAOK drawdown since its inception was -19.91%, which is greater than ASET's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAOK and ASET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAOK | ASET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.91% | 0.00% | -19.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | 0.00% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.02% | 0.00% | -5.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | — | — |
Volatility
EAOK vs. ASET - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAOK | ASET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.05% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.48% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.49% | 0.00% | +5.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.04% | 0.00% | +7.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.83% | 0.00% | +6.83% |
EAOK vs. ASET - Expense Ratio Comparison
EAOK has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ASET's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
EAOK vs. ASET - Dividend Comparison
EAOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, while ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EAOK iShares ESG Aware Conservative Allocation ETF | 3.17% | 3.18% | 3.15% | 2.80% | 2.27% | 1.19% | 1.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, EAOK is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EAOK is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for ASET.
EAOK has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 0.00% for ASET.
EAOK tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Conservative Allocation Index, while ASET tracks Northern Trust Real Assets Allocation Total Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EAOK and 0.57% for ASET.
Find the right allocation for EAOK and ASET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer