PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EALCX vs. VTMGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EALCX vs. VTMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Growth Fund (EALCX) and Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EALCX achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly lower than VTMGX's 15.59% return. Over the past 10 years, EALCX has outperformed VTMGX with an annualized return of 16.00%, while VTMGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.21% annualized return.


EALCX

1D
0.60%
1M
5.77%
YTD
9.21%
6M
8.57%
1Y
24.04%
3Y*
23.77%
5Y*
12.47%
10Y*
16.00%

VTMGX

1D
0.30%
1M
5.13%
YTD
15.59%
6M
19.38%
1Y
32.28%
3Y*
20.10%
5Y*
9.80%
10Y*
10.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EALCX vs. VTMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EALCX
Eaton Vance Growth Fund
9.21%14.63%32.44%38.46%-29.60%19.52%37.19%30.32%-0.21%25.41%
VTMGX
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares
15.59%35.17%3.03%17.65%-15.33%11.39%10.25%22.04%-14.48%26.39%

Correlation

The correlation between EALCX and VTMGX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.71

The correlation between EALCX and VTMGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (3 years) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EALCX vs. VTMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EALCX
EALCX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
EALCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EALCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
EALCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
EALCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
EALCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

VTMGX
VTMGX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
VTMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
VTMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EALCX vs. VTMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Growth Fund (EALCX) and Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EALCXVTMGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.69

2.24

-0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.32

3.04

-0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.40

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

2.92

-1.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.30

11.33

-5.03

EALCX vs. VTMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EALCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the VTMGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EALCX and VTMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EALCXVTMGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

2.24

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.62

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.62

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.31

+0.49

Drawdowns

EALCX vs. VTMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EALCX drawdown since its inception was -33.96%, smaller than the maximum VTMGX drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EALCX and VTMGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EALCXVTMGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.96%

-60.58%

+26.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.36%

-11.67%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.50%

-13.18%

-12.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.96%

-29.71%

-4.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.96%

-35.68%

+1.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.74%

-14.66%

+8.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.92%

3.01%

+0.91%

Volatility

EALCX vs. VTMGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Growth Fund (EALCX) is 3.17%, while Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTMGX) has a volatility of 5.01%. This indicates that EALCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EALCXVTMGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.17%

5.01%

-1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.15%

12.54%

-1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.78%

15.14%

-0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.45%

15.87%

+5.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.32%

16.54%

+4.78%

EALCX vs. VTMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EALCX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VTMGX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

EALCX vs. VTMGX - Dividend Comparison

EALCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.56%, more than VTMGX's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EALCX
Eaton Vance Growth Fund
13.56%14.80%7.04%9.15%5.74%8.49%6.99%9.02%14.01%4.91%1.92%4.35%
VTMGX
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares
2.59%3.20%3.34%3.14%2.88%3.14%2.02%3.03%3.33%2.77%3.06%2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


EALCX and VTMGX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTMGX has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to EALCX (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EALCX dropped -33.96% vs VTMGX's -60.58%.

VTMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EALCX and VTMGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer