EALCX vs. EIAMX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EALCX (Eaton Vance Growth Fund) and EIAMX (Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund) are both mutual funds - EALCX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Eaton Vance, while EIAMX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Eaton Vance. Over the past 10 years, EALCX returned 16.00%/yr vs 4.86%/yr for EIAMX. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EALCX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for EIAMX.

Performance

EALCX vs. EIAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Growth Fund (EALCX) and Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund (EIAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EALCX achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly higher than EIAMX's 1.46% return. Over the past 10 years, EALCX has outperformed EIAMX with an annualized return of 16.00%, while EIAMX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.86% annualized return.

EALCX

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 5.77%
• YTD: 9.21%
• 6M: 8.57%
• 1Y: 24.04%
• 3Y*: 23.77%
• 5Y*: 12.47%
• 10Y*: 16.00%

EIAMX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.54%
• YTD: 1.46%
• 6M: 1.91%
• 1Y: 5.54%
• 3Y*: 7.54%
• 5Y*: 4.17%
• 10Y*: 4.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EALCX vs. EIAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EALCX Eaton Vance Growth Fund	9.21%	14.63%	32.44%	38.46%	-29.60%	19.52%	37.19%	30.32%	-0.21%	25.41%
EIAMX Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund	1.46%	6.31%	8.22%	9.93%	-6.18%	4.57%	1.89%	11.67%	-2.45%	11.61%

Correlation

The correlation between EALCX and EIAMX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.47

The correlation between EALCX and EIAMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EALCX vs. EIAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EALCX

EALCX Risk / Return Rank: 28
EALCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
EALCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
EALCX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
EALCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
EALCX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

EIAMX

EIAMX Risk / Return Rank: 86
EIAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
EIAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
EIAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
EIAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
EIAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EALCX vs. EIAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Growth Fund (EALCX) and Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund (EIAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EALCX	EIAMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	2.30	-0.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	5.22	-2.90
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.78	-0.49
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.72	4.04	-2.33
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.30	19.02	-12.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EALCX vs. EIAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EALCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the EIAMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EALCX and EIAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EALCX	EIAMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.69	2.30	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	1.31	-0.72
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75	0.22	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.23	+0.56

Drawdowns

EALCX vs. EIAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EALCX drawdown since its inception was -33.96%, smaller than the maximum EIAMX drawdown of -43.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EALCX and EIAMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EALCX	EIAMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.96%	-43.35%	+9.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.36%	-1.52%	-12.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.50%	-2.95%	-22.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.96%	-10.02%	-23.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.96%	-43.35%	+9.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-8.87%	+8.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.74%	-16.13%	+10.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.92%	0.32%	+3.60%

Volatility

EALCX vs. EIAMX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Growth Fund (EALCX) has a higher volatility of 3.17% compared to Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund (EIAMX) at 0.62%. This indicates that EALCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EALCX	EIAMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.17%	0.62%	+2.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.15%	1.86%	+9.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.78%	2.42%	+12.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.45%	3.20%	+18.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.32%	22.48%	-1.16%

EALCX vs. EIAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EALCX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than EIAMX's 0.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

EALCX vs. EIAMX - Dividend Comparison

EALCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.56%, more than EIAMX's 6.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EALCX Eaton Vance Growth Fund	13.56%	14.80%	7.04%	9.15%	5.74%	8.49%	6.99%	9.02%	14.01%	4.91%	1.92%	4.35%
EIAMX Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund	6.88%	7.04%	7.35%	5.52%	5.46%	4.10%	4.46%	4.94%	2.41%	2.88%	3.15%	3.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EALCX and EIAMX in my portfolio?

EALCX and EIAMX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EALCX or EIAMX?

EALCX has higher volatility (3.17%) compared to EIAMX (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EALCX dropped -33.96% vs EIAMX's -43.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EIAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.