EALCX vs. FTQGX

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

EALCX (Eaton Vance Growth Fund) and FTQGX (Fidelity Focused Stock Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, EALCX returned 15.77%/yr vs 19.75%/yr for FTQGX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EALCX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for FTQGX.

Performance

EALCX vs. FTQGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Growth Fund (EALCX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EALCX achieves a 4.92% return, which is significantly lower than FTQGX's 32.07% return. Over the past 10 years, EALCX has underperformed FTQGX with an annualized return of 15.77%, while FTQGX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.75% annualized return.

EALCX

• 1D: 1.36%
• 1M: -1.77%
• YTD: 4.92%
• 6M: 5.56%
• 1Y: 19.42%
• 3Y*: 21.03%
• 5Y*: 11.21%
• 10Y*: 15.77%

FTQGX

• 1D: 2.51%
• 1M: 9.08%
• YTD: 32.07%
• 6M: 32.21%
• 1Y: 56.90%
• 3Y*: 30.72%
• 5Y*: 17.35%
• 10Y*: 19.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EALCX vs. FTQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EALCX Eaton Vance Growth Fund	4.92%	14.63%	32.44%	38.46%	-29.60%	19.52%	37.19%	30.32%	-0.21%	25.41%
FTQGX Fidelity Focused Stock Fund	32.07%	13.65%	36.95%	28.94%	-26.68%	26.91%	33.41%	31.44%	4.90%	30.66%

Correlation

The correlation between EALCX and FTQGX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013	0.92

The correlation between EALCX and FTQGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EALCX vs. FTQGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EALCX

EALCX Risk / Return Rank: 20
EALCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
EALCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
EALCX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
EALCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
EALCX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

FTQGX

FTQGX Risk / Return Rank: 86
FTQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FTQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FTQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FTQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FTQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EALCX vs. FTQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Growth Fund (EALCX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EALCX	FTQGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	2.64	-1.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	3.32	-1.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.45	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	4.41	-3.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.64	18.55	-13.91

EALCX vs. FTQGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EALCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the FTQGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EALCX and FTQGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EALCX vs. FTQGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EALCX drawdown since its inception was -33.96%, smaller than the maximum FTQGX drawdown of -61.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EALCX and FTQGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EALCX	FTQGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.96%	-61.29%	+27.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.36%	-12.76%	-1.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.50%	-26.84%	+1.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.96%	-32.31%	-1.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.96%	-32.31%	-1.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.93%	0.00%	-3.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.73%	-14.17%	+8.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.03%	3.03%	+1.00%

Volatility

EALCX vs. FTQGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Growth Fund (EALCX) is 5.50%, while Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX) has a volatility of 8.94%. This indicates that EALCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTQGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EALCX	FTQGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.50%	8.94%	-3.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.06%	17.12%	-5.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.45%	21.33%	-5.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.54%	21.96%	-0.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.37%	21.71%	-0.34%

EALCX vs. FTQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EALCX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FTQGX's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

EALCX vs. FTQGX - Dividend Comparison

EALCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.11%, more than FTQGX's 9.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EALCX Eaton Vance Growth Fund	14.11%	14.80%	7.04%	9.15%	5.74%	8.49%	6.99%	9.02%	14.01%	4.91%	1.92%	4.35%
FTQGX Fidelity Focused Stock Fund	9.42%	12.44%	9.94%	0.61%	7.96%	13.53%	11.41%	5.07%	14.71%	5.89%	1.08%	5.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EALCX and FTQGX in my portfolio?

EALCX and FTQGX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EALCX or FTQGX?

FTQGX has higher volatility (8.94%) compared to EALCX (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EALCX dropped -33.96% vs FTQGX's -61.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTQGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.