PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAIIX vs. ETG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EAIIX vs. ETG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund (EAIIX) and Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAIIX achieves a 4.35% return, which is significantly lower than ETG's 7.51% return. Over the past 10 years, EAIIX has underperformed ETG with an annualized return of 2.77%, while ETG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.09% annualized return.


EAIIX

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.66%
6M
2.47%
YTD
4.35%
1Y
9.28%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
1.49%
10Y*
2.77%
ALL TIME*
3.16%

ETG

1D
1.06%
1M
2.27%
6M
4.60%
YTD
7.51%
1Y
26.46%
3Y*
21.40%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
13.09%
ALL TIME*
8.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$2.18M$1.84M$2.42M

EAIIX vs. ETG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EAIIX
Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund
4.35%13.67%-2.81%8.45%-11.29%-5.71%9.33%6.09%-2.67%10.58%
ETG
Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund
7.51%36.92%15.46%21.97%-27.62%33.08%10.08%43.62%-15.90%33.55%

Correlation

The correlation between EAIIX and ETG is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2007

0.27

Over the past year, EAIIX and ETG have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EAIIX vs. ETG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EAIIX
EAIIX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
EAIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
EAIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

ETG
ETG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ETG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETG Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ETG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETG Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EAIIX vs. ETG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund (EAIIX) and Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EAIIXETGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.29

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

1.60

+2.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.11

6.33

+8.78

EAIIX vs. ETG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAIIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.18, which is higher than the ETG Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAIIX and ETG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EAIIX vs. ETG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAIIX drawdown since its inception was -25.32%, smaller than the maximum ETG drawdown of -74.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAIIX and ETG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EAIIXETGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.32%

-74.76%

+49.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.33%

-16.64%

+14.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.35%

-16.95%

+8.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.13%

-31.64%

+8.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.32%

-51.53%

+26.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

0.00%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-13.39%

+8.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.65%

4.19%

-3.54%

Volatility

EAIIX vs. ETG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund (EAIIX) is 0.75%, while Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that EAIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EAIIXETGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

4.83%

-4.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.54%

13.45%

-10.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09%

16.06%

-12.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.54%

19.88%

-13.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.49%

21.21%

-15.72%

EAIIX vs. ETG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAIIX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than ETG's 2.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

EAIIX vs. ETG - Dividend Comparison

EAIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.79%, more than ETG's 6.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EAIIX
Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund
8.79%7.44%4.80%4.42%4.54%5.37%6.13%5.69%4.70%4.43%5.53%5.89%
ETG
Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund
6.50%6.72%8.03%7.02%9.94%6.02%6.74%6.83%9.08%7.69%8.74%7.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


EAIIX and ETG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETG has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to EAIIX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAIIX dropped -25.32% vs ETG's -74.76%.

EAIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAIIX and ETG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer