EAGL vs. VEGA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EAGL (Eagle Capital Select Equity ETF) and VEGA (AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EAGL returned 13.32% vs 18.86% for VEGA. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EAGL charges 0.80%/yr vs 2.02%/yr for VEGA.

Performance

EAGL vs. VEGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eagle Capital Select Equity ETF (EAGL) and AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAGL achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly lower than VEGA's 7.10% return.

EAGL

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: -0.21%
• YTD: 0.59%
• 6M: 1.35%
• 1Y: 13.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VEGA

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 3.04%
• YTD: 7.10%
• 6M: 6.87%
• 1Y: 18.86%
• 3Y*: 13.94%
• 5Y*: 7.25%
• 10Y*: 7.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAGL vs. VEGA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EAGL Eagle Capital Select Equity ETF	0.59%	17.19%	11.27%
VEGA AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF	7.10%	15.83%	5.79%

Correlation

The correlation between EAGL and VEGA is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2024	0.70

The correlation between EAGL and VEGA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

EAGL vs. VEGA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EAGL	VEGA
Technology	22.3%	31.7%
Financial Services	16.9%	14.6%
Consumer Cyclical	15.4%	10.1%
Healthcare	14.8%	8.4%
Communication Services	13.0%	9.3%
Energy	8.9%	3.5%
Industrials	4.2%	10.8%
Basic Materials	2.5%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	2.0%	4.6%
Real Estate	-	1.8%
Utilities	-	2.6%

Return for Risk

EAGL vs. VEGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAGL

EAGL Risk / Return Rank: 27
EAGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
EAGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
EAGL Omega Ratio Rank: 28
EAGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
EAGL Martin Ratio Rank: 26

VEGA

VEGA Risk / Return Rank: 63
VEGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
VEGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
VEGA Omega Ratio Rank: 64
VEGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
VEGA Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAGL vs. VEGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eagle Capital Select Equity ETF (EAGL) and AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EAGL	VEGA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	2.09	-1.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	2.96	-1.48
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.39	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.99	2.76	-1.77
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.37	12.41	-9.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EAGL vs. VEGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAGL Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the VEGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAGL and VEGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EAGL	VEGA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.04	2.09	-1.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	0.53	+0.34

Drawdowns

EAGL vs. VEGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAGL drawdown since its inception was -15.09%, smaller than the maximum VEGA drawdown of -28.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAGL and VEGA.

Drawdown Indicators

	EAGL	VEGA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.09%	-28.37%	+13.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.54%	-6.86%	-6.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.62%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.78%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.49%	-0.52%	-2.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.60%	-3.79%	+1.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.96%	1.52%	+2.44%

Volatility

EAGL vs. VEGA - Volatility Comparison

Eagle Capital Select Equity ETF (EAGL) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA) at 2.71%. This indicates that EAGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EAGL	VEGA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.75%	2.71%	+1.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.84%	7.45%	+2.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.90%	9.06%	+3.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.35%	12.29%	+3.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.35%	12.70%	+2.65%

EAGL vs. VEGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAGL has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than VEGA's 2.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

EAGL vs. VEGA - Dividend Comparison

EAGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than VEGA's 1.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EAGL Eagle Capital Select Equity ETF	0.55%	0.55%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VEGA AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF	1.25%	1.34%	1.05%	1.12%	1.89%	0.55%	0.28%	0.44%	0.45%	0.00%	0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EAGL and VEGA in my portfolio?

EAGL and VEGA have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EAGL or VEGA?

EAGL has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to VEGA (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAGL dropped -15.09% vs VEGA's -28.37%.

Which ETF is better, EAGL or VEGA?

On 1-year performance, VEGA leads with 18.86% vs 13.32% for EAGL. On fees, EAGL is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, VEGA has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EAGL or VEGA?

Over the 1-year period, VEGA has performed better with a 18.86% return vs 13.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EAGL or VEGA?

EAGL is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 2.02% for VEGA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EAGL or VEGA?

VEGA has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.55% for EAGL.

What is the main difference between EAGL and VEGA?

They also come from different issuers: Eagle Capital and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for EAGL and 2.02% for VEGA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VEGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.