EAGG vs. IBTO
EAGG (iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF) and IBTO (iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds from iShares - EAGG tracks the Bloomberg MSCI U.S. Aggregate ESG Focus Index while IBTO tracks the ICE 2033 Maturity US Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EAGG returned 4.59% vs 3.44% for IBTO. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EAGG charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTO.
Performance
EAGG vs. IBTO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAGG achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly higher than IBTO's -0.45% return.
EAGG
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 0.39%
- 1Y
- 4.59%
- 3Y*
- 3.90%
- 5Y*
- 0.03%
- 10Y*
- —
IBTO
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 6M
- -0.59%
- 1Y
- 3.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EAGG vs. IBTO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EAGG iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.34% | 7.18% | 1.12% | 3.47% |
IBTO iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF | -0.45% | 8.23% | -0.87% | 1.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAGG and IBTO is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023 | 0.97 |
The correlation between EAGG and IBTO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAGG vs. IBTO — Risk / Return Rank
EAGG
IBTO
EAGG vs. IBTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF (EAGG) and iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EAGG | IBTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.13 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 0.94 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.15 | 2.72 | +2.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EAGG | IBTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 0.78 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.44 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
EAGG vs. IBTO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAGG drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, which is greater than IBTO's maximum drawdown of -8.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAGG and IBTO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAGG | IBTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.74% | -8.36% | -10.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.75% | -3.66% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.71% | -2.51% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.05% | -2.37% | -3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.89% | 1.27% | -0.38% |
Volatility
EAGG vs. IBTO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF (EAGG) is 1.25%, while iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO) has a volatility of 1.32%. This indicates that EAGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAGG | IBTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.25% | 1.32% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.67% | 3.02% | -0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.79% | 4.46% | -0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.03% | 6.61% | -0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.50% | 6.61% | -1.11% |
EAGG vs. IBTO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EAGG has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTO's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EAGG vs. IBTO - Dividend Comparison
EAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than IBTO's 4.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAGG iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.00% | 3.92% | 3.93% | 3.24% | 2.07% | 1.09% | 1.82% | 3.17% | 0.61% |
IBTO iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF | 4.15% | 4.05% | 4.23% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, EAGG and IBTO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IBTO has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to EAGG (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAGG dropped -18.74% vs IBTO's -8.36%.
On 1-year performance, EAGG leads with 4.59% vs 3.44% for IBTO. On fees, IBTO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EAGG has performed better with a 4.59% return vs 3.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBTO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for EAGG.
IBTO has the higher dividend yield at 4.15%, compared with 4.00% for EAGG.
EAGG tracks Bloomberg MSCI U.S. Aggregate ESG Focus Index, while IBTO tracks ICE 2033 Maturity US Treasury Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for EAGG and 0.07% for IBTO.
EAGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EAGG and IBTO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer