EAFG vs. USOY

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

EAFG (Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) and USOY (Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EAFG is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index, while USOY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Defiance. EAFG is passively managed, while USOY is actively managed. Over the past year, EAFG returned 21.54% vs 41.94% for USOY. Their -0.12 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. EAFG charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for USOY.

Performance

EAFG vs. USOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (EAFG) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAFG achieves a 6.96% return, which is significantly lower than USOY's 51.25% return.

EAFG

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -3.52%
• 6M: 2.12%
• YTD: 6.96%
• 1Y: 21.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.72%

USOY

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: 18.05%
• 6M: 38.09%
• YTD: 51.25%
• 1Y: 41.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EAFG Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	$5.23K	$5.79K	$11.97K
USOY Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF	$3.02M	$3.27M	$3.42M

EAFG vs. USOY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EAFG Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	6.96%	26.39%	-1.85%
USOY Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF	51.25%	-7.93%	6.13%

Correlation

The correlation between EAFG and USOY is -0.25, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2024	-0.12

The correlation between EAFG and USOY shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to -0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EAFG vs. USOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EAFG

EAFG Risk / Return Rank: 45
EAFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
EAFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
EAFG Omega Ratio Rank: 43
EAFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
EAFG Martin Ratio Rank: 48

USOY

USOY Risk / Return Rank: 44
USOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
USOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
USOY Omega Ratio Rank: 47
USOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
USOY Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EAFG vs. USOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (EAFG) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EAFG	USOY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	1.12	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	1.59	+0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.22	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.71	1.53	+0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.57	4.54	+1.04

EAFG vs. USOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAFG Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the USOY Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAFG and USOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EAFG vs. USOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAFG drawdown since its inception was -16.47%, smaller than the maximum USOY drawdown of -25.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAFG and USOY.

Drawdown Indicators

	EAFG	USOY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.47%	-25.51%	+9.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.71%	-25.51%	+12.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.46%	-11.50%	+4.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.27%	-7.16%	+3.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.90%	8.81%	-4.91%

Volatility

EAFG vs. USOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (EAFG) is 6.34%, while Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY) has a volatility of 15.28%. This indicates that EAFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EAFG	USOY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.34%	15.28%	-8.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.11%	32.32%	-15.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.37%	34.89%	-15.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.88%	28.20%	-10.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.88%	28.20%	-10.32%

EAFG vs. USOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAFG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than USOY's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

EAFG vs. USOY - Dividend Comparison

EAFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than USOY's 56.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
EAFG Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	2.04%	1.31%	1.99%
USOY Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF	56.58%	104.32%	48.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EAFG and USOY in my portfolio?

EAFG and USOY have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EAFG or USOY?

USOY has higher volatility (15.28%) compared to EAFG (6.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAFG dropped -16.47% vs USOY's -25.51%.

Which ETF is better, EAFG or USOY?

On 1-year performance, USOY leads with 41.94% vs 21.54% for EAFG. On fees, EAFG is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, EAFG has been the lower-risk option at 6.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EAFG or USOY?

Over the 1-year period, USOY has performed better with a 41.94% return vs 21.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EAFG or USOY?

EAFG is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.22% for USOY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EAFG or USOY?

USOY has the higher dividend yield at 56.58%, compared with 2.04% for EAFG.

What is the main difference between EAFG and USOY?

EAFG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while USOY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for EAFG and 1.22% for USOY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EAFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.