EAFG vs. JIVE

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EAFG (Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) and JIVE (Jpmorgan International Value ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. EAFG is passively managed, while JIVE is actively managed. Over the past year, EAFG returned 24.38% vs 40.77% for JIVE. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EAFG charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for JIVE.

Performance

EAFG vs. JIVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (EAFG) and Jpmorgan International Value ETF (JIVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAFG achieves a 11.36% return, which is significantly lower than JIVE's 14.48% return.

EAFG

• 1D: -3.66%
• 1M: 1.71%
• YTD: 11.36%
• 6M: 10.83%
• 1Y: 24.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JIVE

• 1D: -2.26%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 14.48%
• 6M: 14.57%
• 1Y: 40.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAFG vs. JIVE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EAFG Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	11.36%	26.39%	-5.92%
JIVE Jpmorgan International Value ETF	14.48%	49.80%	4.26%

Correlation

The correlation between EAFG and JIVE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2024	0.81

The correlation between EAFG and JIVE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

EAFG vs. JIVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EAFG	JIVE
Technology	21.2%	11.7%
Basic Materials	17.0%	5.7%
Industrials	15.1%	10.2%
Healthcare	11.2%	4.5%
Communication Services	9.5%	4.2%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	6.2%
Consumer Defensive	6.8%	4.3%
Energy	2.4%	10.7%
Utilities	0.5%	2.4%
Financial Services	0.5%	37.6%
Real Estate	-	2.4%

Return for Risk

EAFG vs. JIVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAFG

EAFG Risk / Return Rank: 41
EAFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
EAFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
EAFG Omega Ratio Rank: 39
EAFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
EAFG Martin Ratio Rank: 46

JIVE

JIVE Risk / Return Rank: 83
JIVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
JIVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
JIVE Omega Ratio Rank: 84
JIVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
JIVE Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAFG vs. JIVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (EAFG) and Jpmorgan International Value ETF (JIVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EAFG	JIVE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	2.70	-1.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.85	3.53	-1.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.48	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.93	3.88	-1.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.06	14.85	-7.79

EAFG vs. JIVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAFG Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the JIVE Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAFG and JIVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EAFG vs. JIVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAFG drawdown since its inception was -16.47%, which is greater than JIVE's maximum drawdown of -13.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAFG and JIVE.

Drawdown Indicators

	EAFG	JIVE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.47%	-13.79%	-2.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.71%	-10.57%	-2.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.66%	-2.81%	-0.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.16%	-1.95%	-1.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.46%	2.75%	+0.71%

Volatility

EAFG vs. JIVE - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (EAFG) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to Jpmorgan International Value ETF (JIVE) at 5.82%. This indicates that EAFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JIVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EAFG	JIVE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.56%	5.82%	+1.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.20%	12.93%	+3.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.51%	15.17%	+3.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.69%	15.14%	+2.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.69%	15.14%	+2.55%

EAFG vs. JIVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAFG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than JIVE's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

EAFG vs. JIVE - Dividend Comparison

EAFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than JIVE's 2.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
EAFG Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	1.96%	1.31%	1.99%	0.00%
JIVE Jpmorgan International Value ETF	2.51%	2.88%	2.48%	0.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EAFG and JIVE in my portfolio?

EAFG and JIVE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EAFG or JIVE?

EAFG has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to JIVE (5.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAFG dropped -16.47% vs JIVE's -13.79%.

Which ETF is better, EAFG or JIVE?

On 1-year performance, JIVE leads with 40.77% vs 24.38% for EAFG. On fees, JIVE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, JIVE has been the lower-risk option at 5.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EAFG or JIVE?

Over the 1-year period, JIVE has performed better with a 40.77% return vs 24.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EAFG or JIVE?

JIVE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EAFG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EAFG or JIVE?

JIVE has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 1.96% for EAFG.

What is the main difference between EAFG and JIVE?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for EAFG and 0.55% for JIVE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JIVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.