EACPX vs. FSPGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EACPX (Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, EACPX returned 9.23%/yr vs 15.40%/yr for FSPGX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EACPX charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.

Performance

EACPX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund (EACPX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EACPX achieves a 3.76% return, which is significantly lower than FSPGX's 7.15% return.

EACPX

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: 2.25%
• YTD: 3.76%
• 6M: 3.62%
• 1Y: 14.48%
• 3Y*: 16.98%
• 5Y*: 9.23%
• 10Y*: 13.93%

FSPGX

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: 5.13%
• YTD: 7.15%
• 6M: 6.29%
• 1Y: 25.29%
• 3Y*: 24.97%
• 5Y*: 15.40%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EACPX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EACPX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund	3.76%	9.13%	21.92%	41.77%	-29.56%	18.48%	33.61%	31.91%	-0.04%	24.22%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	7.15%	18.54%	33.27%	42.77%	-29.17%	27.57%	38.46%	36.38%	-1.79%	27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between EACPX and FSPGX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.97

The correlation between EACPX and FSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EACPX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EACPX

EACPX Risk / Return Rank: 13
EACPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
EACPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
EACPX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
EACPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
EACPX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 27
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EACPX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund (EACPX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EACPX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	1.67	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	2.29	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.29	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.92	1.60	-0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.21	5.36	-2.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EACPX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EACPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EACPX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EACPX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.07	1.67	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.72	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.89	-0.50

Drawdowns

EACPX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EACPX drawdown since its inception was -63.39%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EACPX and FSPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EACPX	FSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.39%	-32.66%	-30.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.26%	-16.17%	-0.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.77%	-23.32%	+2.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.70%	-32.66%	-1.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.01%	-1.70%	-0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.76%	-6.37%	-6.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.68%	4.81%	-0.13%

Volatility

EACPX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund (EACPX) is 3.48%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 3.68%. This indicates that EACPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EACPX	FSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.48%	3.68%	-0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.80%	11.65%	-0.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.07%	15.45%	-1.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.46%	21.50%	-1.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.01%	21.55%	-0.54%

EACPX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EACPX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

EACPX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

EACPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.01%, more than FSPGX's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EACPX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Multi Cap Growth Fund	8.01%	8.31%	4.43%	0.00%	0.00%	3.17%	3.14%	2.22%	2.39%	0.24%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.32%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EACPX and FSPGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, EACPX and FSPGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EACPX or FSPGX?

FSPGX has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to EACPX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EACPX dropped -63.39% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.