PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EACC.NEO vs. INTY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EACC.NEO vs. INTY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF (EACC.NEO) and Evolve International Equity UltraYield ETF (INTY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EACC.NEO

1D
0.66%
1M
4.81%
YTD
8.26%
6M
8.64%
1Y
20.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

INTY.TO

1D
1.37%
1M
7.17%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EACC.NEO vs. INTY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EACC.NEO and INTY.TO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2026

0.70

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EACC.NEO vs. INTY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EACC.NEO
EACC.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
EACC.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EACC.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
EACC.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
EACC.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
EACC.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

INTY.TO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EACC.NEO vs. INTY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF (EACC.NEO) and Evolve International Equity UltraYield ETF (INTY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EACC.NEOINTY.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.14

EACC.NEO vs. INTY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EACC.NEOINTY.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

-0.23

+1.13

Drawdowns

EACC.NEO vs. INTY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EACC.NEO drawdown since its inception was -13.35%, which is greater than INTY.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EACC.NEO and INTY.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EACC.NEOINTY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.35%

-11.06%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-4.67%

+4.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.09%

-5.98%

+3.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

Volatility

EACC.NEO vs. INTY.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EACC.NEOINTY.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.97%

24.61%

-9.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.05%

24.61%

-9.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.05%

24.61%

-9.56%

EACC.NEO vs. INTY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EACC.NEO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than INTY.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

EACC.NEO vs. INTY.TO - Dividend Comparison

EACC.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.43%, less than INTY.TO's 10.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
EACC.NEO
Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF
7.43%7.55%5.12%
INTY.TO
Evolve International Equity UltraYield ETF
10.57%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EACC.NEO and INTY.TO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EACC.NEO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EACC.NEO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for INTY.TO.

Both ETFs track MSCI EAFE Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EACC.NEO and 0.60% for INTY.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EACC.NEO and INTY.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer