EACC.NEO vs. INTY.TO
EACC.NEO (Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF) and INTY.TO (Evolve International Equity UltraYield ETF) are both Derivative Income funds tracking the MSCI EAFE Index, from Global X and Evolve respectively. Both are passively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EACC.NEO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for INTY.TO.
Performance
EACC.NEO vs. INTY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EACC.NEO
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 8.26%
- 6M
- 8.64%
- 1Y
- 20.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTY.TO
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 7.17%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EACC.NEO vs. INTY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EACC.NEO Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF | 4.15% |
INTY.TO Evolve International Equity UltraYield ETF | -2.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between EACC.NEO and INTY.TO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2026 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EACC.NEO vs. INTY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EACC.NEO
INTY.TO
EACC.NEO vs. INTY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF (EACC.NEO) and Evolve International Equity UltraYield ETF (INTY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EACC.NEO | INTY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.14 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EACC.NEO | INTY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | -0.23 | +1.13 |
Drawdowns
EACC.NEO vs. INTY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EACC.NEO drawdown since its inception was -13.35%, which is greater than INTY.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EACC.NEO and INTY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EACC.NEO | INTY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.35% | -11.06% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -4.67% | +4.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.09% | -5.98% | +3.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | — | — |
Volatility
EACC.NEO vs. INTY.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EACC.NEO | INTY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.79% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.97% | 24.61% | -9.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.05% | 24.61% | -9.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.05% | 24.61% | -9.56% |
EACC.NEO vs. INTY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EACC.NEO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than INTY.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
EACC.NEO vs. INTY.TO - Dividend Comparison
EACC.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.43%, less than INTY.TO's 10.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EACC.NEO Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF | 7.43% | 7.55% | 5.12% |
INTY.TO Evolve International Equity UltraYield ETF | 10.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EACC.NEO and INTY.TO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EACC.NEO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EACC.NEO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for INTY.TO.
Both ETFs track MSCI EAFE Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EACC.NEO and 0.60% for INTY.TO.
Find the right allocation for EACC.NEO and INTY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer