EACC.NEO vs. HYLD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EACC.NEO (Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF) and HYLD (High Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EACC.NEO is a Derivative Income fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Index, while HYLD is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Eve Capital. EACC.NEO is passively managed, while HYLD is actively managed. EACC.NEO charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for HYLD.

Performance

EACC.NEO vs. HYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF (EACC.NEO) and High Yield ETF (HYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

EACC.NEO is traded in CAD, while HYLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HYLD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

EACC.NEO

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 2.55%
• YTD: 8.26%
• 6M: 9.58%
• 1Y: 20.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HYLD

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EACC.NEO vs. HYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EACC.NEO Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF	8.26%	18.86%	0.72%
HYLD High Yield ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Return for Risk

EACC.NEO vs. HYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EACC.NEO

EACC.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 39
EACC.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
EACC.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
EACC.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 43
EACC.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
EACC.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EACC.NEO vs. HYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF (EACC.NEO) and High Yield ETF (HYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EACC.NEO	HYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.79	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.14	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EACC.NEO	HYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.35	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	EACC.NEO	HYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.08%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.09%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.28%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EACC.NEO	HYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.26%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.79%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.97%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.05%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.05%	—	—

EACC.NEO vs. HYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EACC.NEO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than HYLD's 1.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

EACC.NEO vs. HYLD - Dividend Comparison

EACC.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.43%, while HYLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EACC.NEO Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF	7.43%	7.55%	5.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HYLD High Yield ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.67%	7.86%	6.45%	7.52%	7.46%	7.97%	7.18%	6.59%	10.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, EACC.NEO or HYLD?

On fees, EACC.NEO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EACC.NEO or HYLD?

EACC.NEO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for HYLD.

What is the main difference between EACC.NEO and HYLD?

EACC.NEO is categorized as Derivative Income, while HYLD is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Eve Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EACC.NEO and 1.29% for HYLD.