EACC.NEO vs. EMAX.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EACC.NEO (Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF) and EMAX.TO (Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EACC.NEO is a Derivative Income fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Index, while EMAX.TO is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital. EACC.NEO is passively managed, while EMAX.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, EACC.NEO returned 20.09% vs 51.45% for EMAX.TO. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EACC.NEO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for EMAX.TO.

Performance

EACC.NEO vs. EMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF (EACC.NEO) and Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EACC.NEO achieves a 8.26% return, which is significantly lower than EMAX.TO's 30.95% return.

EACC.NEO

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 4.81%
• YTD: 8.26%
• 6M: 8.64%
• 1Y: 20.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMAX.TO

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 30.95%
• 6M: 24.03%
• 1Y: 51.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EACC.NEO vs. EMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EACC.NEO Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF	8.26%	18.86%	0.72%
EMAX.TO Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF	30.95%	4.63%	-9.11%

Correlation

The correlation between EACC.NEO and EMAX.TO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2024	0.14

The correlation between EACC.NEO and EMAX.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EACC.NEO vs. EMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EACC.NEO

EACC.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 39
EACC.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
EACC.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
EACC.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 43
EACC.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
EACC.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 39

EMAX.TO

EMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 76
EMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
EMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
EMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 71
EMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
EMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EACC.NEO vs. EMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF (EACC.NEO) and Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EACC.NEO	EMAX.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	2.60	-1.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	3.33	-1.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.42	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.79	4.17	-2.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.14	13.39	-7.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EACC.NEO vs. EMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EACC.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the EMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EACC.NEO and EMAX.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EACC.NEO	EMAX.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.35	2.60	-1.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	0.73	+0.17

Drawdowns

EACC.NEO vs. EMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EACC.NEO drawdown since its inception was -13.35%, smaller than the maximum EMAX.TO drawdown of -27.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EACC.NEO and EMAX.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EACC.NEO	EMAX.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.35%	-27.55%	+14.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.30%	-12.39%	+1.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.08%	-3.58%	+3.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.09%	-9.30%	+7.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.28%	3.85%	-0.57%

Volatility

EACC.NEO vs. EMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF (EACC.NEO) is 4.26%, while Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO) has a volatility of 7.47%. This indicates that EACC.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EACC.NEO	EMAX.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.26%	7.47%	-3.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.79%	15.23%	-2.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.97%	19.97%	-5.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.05%	22.39%	-7.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.05%	22.39%	-7.34%

EACC.NEO vs. EMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EACC.NEO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than EMAX.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

EACC.NEO vs. EMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

EACC.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.43%, less than EMAX.TO's 10.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
EACC.NEO Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF	7.43%	7.55%	5.12%
EMAX.TO Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF	10.23%	13.44%	12.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EACC.NEO and EMAX.TO in my portfolio?

EACC.NEO and EMAX.TO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EACC.NEO or EMAX.TO?

On fees, EACC.NEO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EACC.NEO or EMAX.TO?

EACC.NEO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EMAX.TO.

What is the main difference between EACC.NEO and EMAX.TO?

EACC.NEO is categorized as Derivative Income, while EMAX.TO is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Hamilton Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EACC.NEO and 0.65% for EMAX.TO.