EACC.NEO vs. CRCY.TO
EACC.NEO (Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF) and CRCY.TO (Harvest Circle Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units) are both Derivative Income funds. EACC.NEO is passively managed, while CRCY.TO is actively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EACC.NEO vs. CRCY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EACC.NEO achieves a 8.26% return, which is significantly higher than CRCY.TO's 4.52% return.
EACC.NEO
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 8.26%
- 6M
- 8.64%
- 1Y
- 20.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRCY.TO
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -18.00%
- YTD
- 4.52%
- 6M
- -5.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EACC.NEO vs. CRCY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EACC.NEO Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF | 8.26% | 2.32% |
CRCY.TO Harvest Circle Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 4.52% | -45.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between EACC.NEO and CRCY.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EACC.NEO vs. CRCY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EACC.NEO
CRCY.TO
EACC.NEO vs. CRCY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF (EACC.NEO) and Harvest Circle Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (CRCY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EACC.NEO | CRCY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.14 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EACC.NEO | CRCY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | -0.52 | +1.42 |
Drawdowns
EACC.NEO vs. CRCY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EACC.NEO drawdown since its inception was -13.35%, smaller than the maximum CRCY.TO drawdown of -73.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EACC.NEO and CRCY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EACC.NEO | CRCY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.35% | -73.84% | +60.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -52.74% | +52.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.09% | -46.01% | +43.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | — | — |
Volatility
EACC.NEO vs. CRCY.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EACC.NEO | CRCY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.79% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.97% | 110.06% | -95.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.05% | 110.06% | -95.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.05% | 110.06% | -95.01% |
Dividends
EACC.NEO vs. CRCY.TO - Dividend Comparison
EACC.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.43%, less than CRCY.TO's 44.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CRCY.TO Harvest Circle Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 44.49% | 17.09% | 0.00% |
EACC.NEO Global X MSCI EAFE Covered Call ETF | 7.43% | 7.55% | 5.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EACC.NEO and CRCY.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Harvest.
Find the right allocation for EACC.NEO and CRCY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer