EAASX vs. LSHAX
EAASX (Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A) and LSHAX (Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, EAASX returned 10.12%/yr vs 17.42%/yr for LSHAX. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EAASX charges 1.14%/yr vs 1.68%/yr for LSHAX.
Performance
EAASX vs. LSHAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAASX achieves a 5.12% return, which is significantly lower than LSHAX's 32.50% return. Over the past 10 years, EAASX has underperformed LSHAX with an annualized return of 10.12%, while LSHAX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.42% annualized return.
EAASX
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- 6M
- 3.81%
- YTD
- 5.12%
- 1Y
- 2.16%
- 3Y*
- 6.82%
- 5Y*
- 4.92%
- 10Y*
- 10.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.69%
LSHAX
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- 6M
- 12.03%
- YTD
- 32.50%
- 1Y
- 24.27%
- 3Y*
- 25.70%
- 5Y*
- 14.50%
- 10Y*
- 17.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.46%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
EAASX vs. LSHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAASX Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A | 5.12% | -5.90% | 17.89% | 13.72% | -8.98% | 21.66% | 11.03% | 34.03% | -5.79% | 24.40% |
LSHAX Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund | 32.50% | -19.53% | 82.16% | -19.74% | 39.45% | 42.75% | 5.23% | 31.30% | -8.18% | 15.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAASX and LSHAX is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EAASX and LSHAX has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAASX vs. LSHAX — Risk / Return Rank
EAASX
LSHAX
EAASX vs. LSHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A (EAASX) and Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EAASX | LSHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.12 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 0.65 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.23 | 1.43 | -1.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EAASX vs. LSHAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAASX drawdown since its inception was -39.96%, smaller than the maximum LSHAX drawdown of -69.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAASX and LSHAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAASX | LSHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.96% | -69.03% | +29.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.86% | -28.39% | +15.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.45% | -45.79% | +26.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.95% | -45.79% | +25.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.96% | -50.78% | +10.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.80% | -25.49% | +18.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.57% | -21.96% | +17.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.51% | 13.03% | -6.52% |
Volatility
EAASX vs. LSHAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A (EAASX) is 5.61%, while Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX) has a volatility of 8.73%. This indicates that EAASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAASX | LSHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 8.73% | -3.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.12% | 30.05% | -17.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.17% | 38.97% | -22.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 34.59% | -17.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.88% | 30.98% | -12.10% |
EAASX vs. LSHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EAASX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is lower than LSHAX's 1.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
EAASX vs. LSHAX - Dividend Comparison
EAASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, less than LSHAX's 8.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAASX Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A | 7.37% | 7.75% | 8.22% | 3.08% | 12.28% | 12.19% | 11.17% | 7.09% | 8.01% | 3.64% | 3.93% | 7.29% |
LSHAX Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund | 8.75% | 11.59% | 4.66% | 9.40% | 1.76% | 0.11% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 4.85% | 3.94% | 1.84% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EAASX and LSHAX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LSHAX has higher volatility (8.73%) compared to EAASX (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAASX dropped -39.96% vs LSHAX's -69.03%.
LSHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EAASX and LSHAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer