DZZ vs. KOLD
DZZ (DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes) and KOLD (ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas) are both exchange-traded funds - DZZ is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (-200%), while KOLD is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DZZ returned -8.74%/yr vs -24.95%/yr for KOLD. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. DZZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for KOLD.
Performance
DZZ vs. KOLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DZZ achieves a -46.07% return, which is significantly lower than KOLD's -37.11% return. Over the past 10 years, DZZ has outperformed KOLD with an annualized return of -8.74%, while KOLD has yielded a comparatively lower -24.95% annualized return.
DZZ
- 1D
- 12.25%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- -46.07%
- 6M
- -41.83%
- 1Y
- 9.29%
- 3Y*
- -6.52%
- 5Y*
- -6.15%
- 10Y*
- -8.74%
KOLD
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -14.69%
- YTD
- -37.11%
- 6M
- -35.71%
- 1Y
- -9.76%
- 3Y*
- -5.44%
- 5Y*
- -37.40%
- 10Y*
- -24.95%
DZZ vs. KOLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DZZ DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes | -46.07% | 132.78% | -35.06% | -8.14% | 2.79% | 0.56% | -37.13% | -26.64% | 8.21% | -21.81% |
KOLD ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas | -37.11% | -17.48% | -11.34% | 249.82% | -88.62% | -74.44% | 22.05% | 82.94% | -46.48% | 72.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between DZZ and KOLD is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2011 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DZZ vs. KOLD — Risk / Return Rank
DZZ
KOLD
DZZ vs. KOLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) and ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas (KOLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DZZ | KOLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.09 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.12 | -0.14 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.16 | -0.26 | +0.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DZZ vs. KOLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DZZ drawdown since its inception was -96.64%, roughly equal to the maximum KOLD drawdown of -99.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DZZ and KOLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DZZ | KOLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.64% | -99.45% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -81.05% | -72.50% | -8.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -81.05% | -84.34% | +3.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.05% | -97.96% | +16.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.05% | -99.45% | +18.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.95% | -97.43% | +2.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.33% | -69.58% | -12.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.67% | 38.27% | +18.40% |
Volatility
DZZ vs. KOLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) is 19.32%, while ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas (KOLD) has a volatility of 23.44%. This indicates that DZZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KOLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DZZ | KOLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.32% | 23.44% | -4.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.17% | 95.95% | -34.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 170.20% | 112.90% | +57.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.98% | 118.80% | -34.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.16% | 101.79% | -37.63% |
DZZ vs. KOLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DZZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than KOLD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
DZZ vs. KOLD - Dividend Comparison
Neither DZZ nor KOLD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DZZ and KOLD have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KOLD has higher volatility (23.44%) compared to DZZ (19.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DZZ dropped -96.64% vs KOLD's -99.45%.
On 10-year performance, DZZ leads with -8.74% vs -24.95% for KOLD. On fees, DZZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DZZ has been the lower-risk option at 19.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DZZ has performed better with a -8.74% return vs -24.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DZZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for KOLD.
DZZ and KOLD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DZZ is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while KOLD is Oil & Gas. DZZ tracks Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (-200%), while KOLD tracks Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DZZ and 0.95% for KOLD.
DZZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.05 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DZZ and KOLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer