DYNF vs. VYMI
DYNF (iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF) and VYMI (Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DYNF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while VYMI is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE All-World ex US High Dividend Yield Index. DYNF is actively managed, while VYMI is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DYNF returned 14.62%/yr vs 12.29%/yr for VYMI. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DYNF charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VYMI.
Performance
DYNF vs. VYMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DYNF achieves a 9.88% return, which is significantly lower than VYMI's 12.90% return.
DYNF
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 9.88%
- 6M
- 10.36%
- 1Y
- 28.69%
- 3Y*
- 24.87%
- 5Y*
- 14.62%
- 10Y*
- —
VYMI
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- YTD
- 12.90%
- 6M
- 14.90%
- 1Y
- 31.26%
- 3Y*
- 21.73%
- 5Y*
- 12.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.24%
DYNF vs. VYMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | 9.88% | 20.00% | 30.29% | 36.25% | -20.27% | 22.12% | 13.47% | 14.75% |
VYMI Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF | 12.90% | 38.05% | 7.06% | 17.07% | -7.02% | 15.39% | -1.11% | 6.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between DYNF and VYMI is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019 | 0.71 |
The correlation between DYNF and VYMI shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (3 years) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DYNF vs. VYMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DYNF
VYMI
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Technology
DYNF
VYMI
Financial Services
DYNF
VYMI
Communication Services
DYNF
VYMI
Industrials
DYNF
VYMI
Consumer Cyclical
DYNF
VYMI
Healthcare
DYNF
VYMI
Energy
DYNF
VYMI
Utilities
DYNF
VYMI
Real Estate
DYNF
VYMI
Consumer Defensive
DYNF
VYMI
Basic Materials
DYNF
VYMI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DYNF vs. VYMI — Risk / Return Rank
DYNF
VYMI
DYNF vs. VYMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DYNF | VYMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.41 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 2.96 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.77 | 11.60 | +3.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DYNF vs. VYMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DYNF drawdown since its inception was -34.72%, smaller than the maximum VYMI drawdown of -40.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYNF and VYMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DYNF | VYMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.72% | -40.00% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.67% | -10.14% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.70% | -12.84% | -5.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.65% | -24.05% | -4.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.06% | 0.00% | -2.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.96% | -6.30% | +0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 2.59% | -0.74% |
Volatility
DYNF vs. VYMI - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) has a higher volatility of 4.91% compared to Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI) at 4.40%. This indicates that DYNF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DYNF | VYMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.91% | 4.40% | +0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | 11.15% | -0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.01% | 13.33% | -0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 14.90% | +2.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.91% | 16.85% | +3.06% |
DYNF vs. VYMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
DYNF has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than VYMI's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DYNF vs. VYMI - Dividend Comparison
DYNF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than VYMI's 3.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | 0.90% | 1.01% | 0.65% | 1.11% | 1.66% | 2.89% | 1.52% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VYMI Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF | 3.39% | 3.68% | 4.84% | 4.58% | 4.70% | 4.30% | 3.22% | 4.20% | 4.29% | 3.21% | 2.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DYNF and VYMI have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DYNF has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to VYMI (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYNF dropped -34.72% vs VYMI's -40.00%.
On 5-year performance, DYNF leads with 14.62% vs 12.29% for VYMI. On fees, VYMI is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VYMI has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DYNF has performed better with a 14.62% return vs 12.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYMI is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for DYNF.
VYMI has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 0.90% for DYNF.
DYNF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VYMI is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for DYNF and 0.07% for VYMI.
VYMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DYNF and VYMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer