DYNF vs. GDMN

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

DYNF (iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF) and GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DYNF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while GDMN is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DYNF returned 25.36%/yr vs 59.33%/yr for GDMN. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DYNF charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GDMN.

Performance

DYNF vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DYNF achieves a 12.25% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -7.24% return.

DYNF

• 1D: 2.16%
• 1M: 2.71%
• YTD: 12.25%
• 6M: 12.86%
• 1Y: 31.46%
• 3Y*: 25.36%
• 5Y*: 15.35%
• 10Y*: —

GDMN

• 1D: 7.58%
• 1M: -7.37%
• YTD: -7.24%
• 6M: -6.40%
• 1Y: 63.42%
• 3Y*: 59.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DYNF vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF	12.25%	20.00%	30.29%	36.25%	-20.27%	0.89%
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	-7.24%	237.09%	28.23%	12.97%	-14.62%	6.93%

Correlation

The correlation between DYNF and GDMN is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021	0.22

The correlation between DYNF and GDMN shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DYNF vs. GDMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DYNF	GDMN
Technology	40.1%	-
Financial Services	14.9%	-
Communication Services	10.7%	-
Industrials	8.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.1%	-
Healthcare	6.1%	-
Energy	5.0%	-
Utilities	2.8%	-
Real Estate	2.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.7%	-
Basic Materials	0.8%	100.0%

Return for Risk

DYNF vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DYNF

DYNF Risk / Return Rank: 82
DYNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
DYNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
DYNF Omega Ratio Rank: 82
DYNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
DYNF Martin Ratio Rank: 88

GDMN

GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 30
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 34
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DYNF vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DYNF	GDMN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	1.00	+1.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.23	1.47	+1.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.21	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.65	1.31	+2.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.10	3.52	+13.58

DYNF vs. GDMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DYNF Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the GDMN Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DYNF and GDMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DYNF vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DYNF drawdown since its inception was -34.72%, smaller than the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYNF and GDMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	DYNF	GDMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.72%	-52.82%	+18.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.67%	-48.76%	+40.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.70%	-48.76%	+30.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.65%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-39.10%	+39.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.96%	-19.04%	+13.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	18.18%	-16.33%

Volatility

DYNF vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) is 5.25%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 23.53%. This indicates that DYNF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DYNF	GDMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.25%	23.53%	-18.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.57%	54.66%	-44.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.14%	63.80%	-50.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.61%	48.17%	-30.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.92%	48.17%	-28.25%

DYNF vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

DYNF has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

DYNF vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

DYNF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than GDMN's 2.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF	1.06%	1.01%	0.65%	1.11%	1.66%	2.89%	1.52%	1.22%
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	2.91%	2.70%	9.44%	7.69%	1.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DYNF and GDMN in my portfolio?

DYNF and GDMN have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DYNF or GDMN?

GDMN has higher volatility (23.53%) compared to DYNF (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYNF dropped -34.72% vs GDMN's -52.82%.

Which ETF is better, DYNF or GDMN?

On 3-year performance, GDMN leads with 59.33% vs 25.36% for DYNF. On fees, DYNF is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, DYNF has been the lower-risk option at 5.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DYNF or GDMN?

Over the 3-year period, GDMN has performed better with a 59.33% return vs 25.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DYNF or GDMN?

DYNF is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GDMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DYNF or GDMN?

GDMN has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 1.06% for DYNF.

What is the main difference between DYNF and GDMN?

DYNF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GDMN is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for DYNF and 0.45% for GDMN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DYNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.