DYNF vs. BRTR
DYNF (BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF) and BRTR (Blackrock Total Return ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DYNF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock, while BRTR is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by BlackRock. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DYNF returned 30.76% vs 5.46% for BRTR. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DYNF charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for BRTR.
Performance
DYNF vs. BRTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DYNF achieves a 11.93% return, which is significantly higher than BRTR's 0.51% return.
DYNF
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 11.93%
- 6M
- 11.85%
- 1Y
- 30.76%
- 3Y*
- 26.47%
- 5Y*
- 15.11%
- 10Y*
- —
BRTR
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 0.61%
- 1Y
- 5.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DYNF vs. BRTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DYNF BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF | 11.93% | 20.00% | 30.29% | 1.05% |
BRTR Blackrock Total Return ETF | 0.51% | 8.11% | 1.29% | 0.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between DYNF and BRTR is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023 | 0.20 |
DYNF vs. BRTR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DYNF
BRTR
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
DYNF
BRTR
Financial Services
DYNF
BRTR
Communication Services
DYNF
BRTR
Industrials
DYNF
BRTR
Consumer Cyclical
DYNF
BRTR
Healthcare
DYNF
BRTR
-
Utilities
DYNF
BRTR
Consumer Defensive
DYNF
BRTR
-
Energy
DYNF
BRTR
Real Estate
DYNF
BRTR
Basic Materials
DYNF
BRTR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DYNF vs. BRTR — Risk / Return Rank
DYNF
BRTR
DYNF vs. BRTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF) and Blackrock Total Return ETF (BRTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DYNF | BRTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.27 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | 1.68 | +1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.29 | 5.07 | +12.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DYNF | BRTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 1.51 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.89 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
DYNF vs. BRTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DYNF drawdown since its inception was -34.72%, which is greater than BRTR's maximum drawdown of -5.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYNF and BRTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DYNF | BRTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.72% | -5.07% | -29.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.67% | -3.26% | -5.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -1.58% | +1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.97% | -1.35% | -4.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 1.08% | +0.70% |
Volatility
DYNF vs. BRTR - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to Blackrock Total Return ETF (BRTR) at 1.27%. This indicates that DYNF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DYNF | BRTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 1.27% | +1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.55% | 2.77% | +6.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.44% | 3.68% | +8.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 4.69% | +12.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 4.69% | +15.21% |
DYNF vs. BRTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DYNF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BRTR's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
DYNF vs. BRTR - Dividend Comparison
DYNF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than BRTR's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRTR Blackrock Total Return ETF | 4.72% | 4.86% | 5.58% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DYNF BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF | 0.88% | 1.01% | 0.65% | 1.11% | 1.66% | 2.89% | 1.52% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DYNF and BRTR have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DYNF has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to BRTR (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYNF dropped -34.72% vs BRTR's -5.07%.
On 1-year performance, DYNF leads with 30.76% vs 5.46% for BRTR. On fees, DYNF is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, BRTR has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DYNF has performed better with a 30.76% return vs 5.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DYNF is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for BRTR.
BRTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 0.88% for DYNF.
DYNF is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BRTR is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for DYNF and 0.38% for BRTR.
DYNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DYNF and BRTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer