DYNF vs. BRLN
DYNF (BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF) and BRLN (BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DYNF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock, while BRLN is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by BlackRock. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DYNF returned 26.47%/yr vs 7.50%/yr for BRLN. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DYNF charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for BRLN.
Performance
DYNF vs. BRLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DYNF achieves a 11.93% return, which is significantly higher than BRLN's 1.44% return.
DYNF
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 11.93%
- 6M
- 11.85%
- 1Y
- 30.76%
- 3Y*
- 26.47%
- 5Y*
- 15.11%
- 10Y*
- —
BRLN
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 5.39%
- 3Y*
- 7.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DYNF vs. BRLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYNF BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF | 11.93% | 20.00% | 30.29% | 36.25% | 3.20% |
BRLN BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF | 1.44% | 5.38% | 7.49% | 13.42% | 2.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between DYNF and BRLN is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2022 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DYNF vs. BRLN — Risk / Return Rank
DYNF
BRLN
DYNF vs. BRLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF) and BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DYNF | BRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.34 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | 2.70 | +0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.29 | 10.51 | +6.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DYNF | BRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 1.77 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 2.19 | -1.36 |
Drawdowns
DYNF vs. BRLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DYNF drawdown since its inception was -34.72%, which is greater than BRLN's maximum drawdown of -3.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYNF and BRLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DYNF | BRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.72% | -3.85% | -30.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.67% | -2.00% | -6.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.70% | -3.85% | -14.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -0.12% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.97% | -0.31% | -5.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 0.51% | +1.27% |
Volatility
DYNF vs. BRLN - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN) at 0.80%. This indicates that DYNF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DYNF | BRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 0.80% | +2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.55% | 2.24% | +7.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.44% | 3.06% | +9.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 3.73% | +13.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 3.73% | +16.17% |
DYNF vs. BRLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
DYNF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BRLN's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
DYNF vs. BRLN - Dividend Comparison
DYNF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than BRLN's 6.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRLN BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF | 6.35% | 6.50% | 7.87% | 9.06% | 1.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DYNF BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF | 0.88% | 1.01% | 0.65% | 1.11% | 1.66% | 2.89% | 1.52% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DYNF and BRLN have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DYNF has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to BRLN (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYNF dropped -34.72% vs BRLN's -3.85%.
On 3-year performance, DYNF leads with 26.47% vs 7.50% for BRLN. On fees, DYNF is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, BRLN has been the lower-risk option at 0.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DYNF has performed better with a 26.47% return vs 7.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DYNF is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for BRLN.
BRLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.35%, compared with 0.88% for DYNF.
DYNF is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BRLN is Bank Loan. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for DYNF and 0.55% for BRLN.
DYNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DYNF and BRLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer