PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DYNF vs. BRLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DYNF vs. BRLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF) and BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DYNF achieves a 11.93% return, which is significantly higher than BRLN's 1.44% return.


DYNF

1D
0.34%
1M
5.19%
YTD
11.93%
6M
11.85%
1Y
30.76%
3Y*
26.47%
5Y*
15.11%
10Y*

BRLN

1D
0.09%
1M
0.87%
YTD
1.44%
6M
2.08%
1Y
5.39%
3Y*
7.50%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DYNF vs. BRLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DYNF
BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF
11.93%20.00%30.29%36.25%3.20%
BRLN
BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF
1.44%5.38%7.49%13.42%2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between DYNF and BRLN is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2022

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DYNF vs. BRLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DYNF
DYNF Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DYNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DYNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DYNF Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DYNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DYNF Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

BRLN
BRLN Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BRLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRLN Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
BRLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRLN Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DYNF vs. BRLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF) and BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DYNFBRLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.34

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

2.70

+0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.29

10.51

+6.78

DYNF vs. BRLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DYNF Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the BRLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DYNF and BRLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DYNFBRLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

1.77

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

2.19

-1.36

Drawdowns

DYNF vs. BRLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DYNF drawdown since its inception was -34.72%, which is greater than BRLN's maximum drawdown of -3.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYNF and BRLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DYNFBRLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.72%

-3.85%

-30.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.67%

-2.00%

-6.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.70%

-3.85%

-14.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.12%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.97%

-0.31%

-5.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

0.51%

+1.27%

Volatility

DYNF vs. BRLN - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN) at 0.80%. This indicates that DYNF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DYNFBRLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

0.80%

+2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.55%

2.24%

+7.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.44%

3.06%

+9.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.49%

3.73%

+13.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.90%

3.73%

+16.17%

DYNF vs. BRLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

DYNF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BRLN's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

DYNF vs. BRLN - Dividend Comparison

DYNF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than BRLN's 6.35% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BRLN
BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF
6.35%6.50%7.87%9.06%1.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DYNF
BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF
0.88%1.01%0.65%1.11%1.66%2.89%1.52%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


DYNF and BRLN have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DYNF has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to BRLN (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYNF dropped -34.72% vs BRLN's -3.85%.

On 3-year performance, DYNF leads with 26.47% vs 7.50% for BRLN. On fees, DYNF is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, BRLN has been the lower-risk option at 0.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DYNF has performed better with a 26.47% return vs 7.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DYNF is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for BRLN.

BRLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.35%, compared with 0.88% for DYNF.

DYNF is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BRLN is Bank Loan. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for DYNF and 0.55% for BRLN.

DYNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DYNF and BRLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer