DYNB vs. XAGG
DYNB (Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF) and XAGG (Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DYNB charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for XAGG.
Performance
DYNB vs. XAGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DYNB achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than XAGG's 2.05% return.
DYNB
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XAGG
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 2.05%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DYNB vs. XAGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DYNB Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF | 0.40% | 0.40% |
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF | 2.05% | 1.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between DYNB and XAGG is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DYNB vs. XAGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF (DYNB) and Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DYNB | XAGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 1.94 | -1.46 |
Drawdowns
DYNB vs. XAGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DYNB drawdown since its inception was -2.61%, smaller than the maximum XAGG drawdown of -2.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYNB and XAGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DYNB | XAGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.61% | -2.88% | +0.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -0.37% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.63% | -0.57% | -0.06% |
Volatility
DYNB vs. XAGG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DYNB | XAGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87% | 3.47% | -0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.87% | 3.47% | -0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.87% | 3.47% | -0.60% |
DYNB vs. XAGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DYNB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XAGG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DYNB vs. XAGG - Dividend Comparison
DYNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, less than XAGG's 3.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DYNB Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF | 2.64% | 1.03% |
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF | 3.86% | 1.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DYNB and XAGG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XAGG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XAGG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DYNB.
XAGG has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 2.64% for DYNB.
They also come from different issuers: Hartford Funds and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DYNB and 0.50% for XAGG.
Find the right allocation for DYNB and XAGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer