DYNB vs. TMB
DYNB (Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF) and TMB (Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DYNB charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TMB.
Performance
DYNB vs. TMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DYNB
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMB
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DYNB vs. TMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DYNB Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF | 0.61% |
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF | 0.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between DYNB and TMB is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DYNB vs. TMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF (DYNB) and Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF (TMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DYNB vs. TMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DYNB drawdown since its inception was -2.61%, which is greater than TMB's maximum drawdown of -0.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYNB and TMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DYNB | TMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.61% | -0.60% | -2.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -0.41% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.66% | -0.24% | -0.42% |
Volatility
DYNB vs. TMB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DYNB | TMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.96% | 3.31% | -0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.96% | 3.31% | -0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.96% | 3.31% | -0.35% |
DYNB vs. TMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DYNB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TMB's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
DYNB vs. TMB - Dividend Comparison
DYNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than TMB's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DYNB Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF | 3.01% | 1.03% |
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF | 0.71% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DYNB and TMB have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMB is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMB is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DYNB.
DYNB has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 0.71% for TMB.
They also come from different issuers: Hartford Funds and Thornburg. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DYNB and 0.55% for TMB.
Find the right allocation for DYNB and TMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer