DYNB vs. PSDM
DYNB (Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF) and PSDM (PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DYNB charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for PSDM.
Performance
DYNB vs. PSDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DYNB achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than PSDM's 1.29% return.
DYNB
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSDM
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DYNB vs. PSDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DYNB Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF | 0.40% | 0.54% |
PSDM PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF | 1.29% | 1.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between DYNB and PSDM is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DYNB vs. PSDM — Risk / Return Rank
DYNB
PSDM
DYNB vs. PSDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF (DYNB) and PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF (PSDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DYNB | PSDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 2.98 | -2.50 |
Drawdowns
DYNB vs. PSDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DYNB drawdown since its inception was -2.61%, which is greater than PSDM's maximum drawdown of -1.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYNB and PSDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DYNB | PSDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.61% | -1.19% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -0.10% | -0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.63% | -0.17% | -0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.26% | — |
Volatility
DYNB vs. PSDM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DYNB | PSDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87% | 1.75% | +1.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.87% | 2.00% | +0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.87% | 2.00% | +0.87% |
DYNB vs. PSDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DYNB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PSDM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
DYNB vs. PSDM - Dividend Comparison
DYNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, less than PSDM's 4.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DYNB Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF | 2.64% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSDM PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF | 4.84% | 4.57% | 5.17% | 2.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DYNB and PSDM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSDM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSDM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DYNB.
PSDM has the higher dividend yield at 4.84%, compared with 2.64% for DYNB.
They also come from different issuers: Hartford Funds and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DYNB and 0.40% for PSDM.
Find the right allocation for DYNB and PSDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer