DYNB vs. MUSI
DYNB (Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF) and MUSI (American Century Multisector Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DYNB charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for MUSI.
Performance
DYNB vs. MUSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DYNB achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than MUSI's 0.76% return.
DYNB
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MUSI
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.76%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 5.62%
- 3Y*
- 6.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DYNB vs. MUSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DYNB Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF | 0.40% | 0.54% |
MUSI American Century Multisector Income ETF | 0.76% | 1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between DYNB and MUSI is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DYNB vs. MUSI — Risk / Return Rank
DYNB
MUSI
DYNB vs. MUSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF (DYNB) and American Century Multisector Income ETF (MUSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DYNB | MUSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.45 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
DYNB vs. MUSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DYNB drawdown since its inception was -2.61%, smaller than the maximum MUSI drawdown of -13.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYNB and MUSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DYNB | MUSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.61% | -13.91% | +11.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -0.98% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.63% | -4.22% | +3.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.78% | — |
Volatility
DYNB vs. MUSI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DYNB | MUSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87% | 3.34% | -0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.87% | 4.84% | -1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.87% | 4.84% | -1.97% |
DYNB vs. MUSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
DYNB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MUSI's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
DYNB vs. MUSI - Dividend Comparison
DYNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, less than MUSI's 5.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYNB Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF | 2.64% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MUSI American Century Multisector Income ETF | 5.53% | 5.74% | 6.00% | 5.20% | 4.02% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, DYNB and MUSI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MUSI is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUSI is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DYNB.
MUSI has the higher dividend yield at 5.53%, compared with 2.64% for DYNB.
They also come from different issuers: Hartford Funds and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DYNB and 0.36% for MUSI.
Find the right allocation for DYNB and MUSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer