DYLG vs. PIT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DYLG (Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF) and PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DYLG is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe DJIA Half BuyWrite Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while PIT is a Commodities fund actively managed by VanEck. DYLG is passively managed, while PIT is actively managed. Over the past year, DYLG returned 18.56% vs 39.64% for PIT. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. DYLG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PIT.

Performance

DYLG vs. PIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DYLG achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 25.62% return.

DYLG

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 1.56%
• YTD: 5.72%
• 6M: 5.32%
• 1Y: 18.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PIT

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -11.78%
• YTD: 25.62%
• 6M: 23.58%
• 1Y: 39.64%
• 3Y*: 18.98%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DYLG vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF	5.72%	12.50%	14.46%	4.05%
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	25.62%	21.63%	6.77%	-5.14%

Correlation

The correlation between DYLG and PIT is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2023	-0.02

The correlation between DYLG and PIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DYLG vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DYLG

DYLG Risk / Return Rank: 60
DYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
DYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
DYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 65
DYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
DYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 56

PIT

PIT Risk / Return Rank: 57
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 56
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DYLG vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DYLG	PIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	1.85	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	2.40	+0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.33	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.24	2.62	-0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.12	10.88	-1.76

DYLG vs. PIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DYLG Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the PIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DYLG and PIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DYLG vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DYLG drawdown since its inception was -13.98%, smaller than the maximum PIT drawdown of -15.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYLG and PIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	DYLG	PIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.98%	-15.19%	+1.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.31%	-15.19%	+6.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.56%	-15.19%	+14.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.83%	-4.08%	+2.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	3.66%	-1.62%

Volatility

DYLG vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG) is 2.70%, while VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that DYLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DYLG	PIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.70%	4.72%	-2.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.75%	19.40%	-11.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.48%	21.66%	-12.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.42%	17.50%	-6.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.42%	17.50%	-6.08%

DYLG vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DYLG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

DYLG vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison

DYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.45%, more than PIT's 7.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF	9.45%	9.63%	16.55%	1.38%
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	7.10%	8.92%	3.59%	6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DYLG and PIT in my portfolio?

DYLG and PIT have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DYLG or PIT?

PIT has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to DYLG (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYLG dropped -13.98% vs PIT's -15.19%.

Which ETF is better, DYLG or PIT?

On 1-year performance, PIT leads with 39.64% vs 18.56% for DYLG. On fees, DYLG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DYLG has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DYLG or PIT?

Over the 1-year period, PIT has performed better with a 39.64% return vs 18.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DYLG or PIT?

DYLG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DYLG or PIT?

DYLG has the higher dividend yield at 9.45%, compared with 7.10% for PIT.

What is the main difference between DYLG and PIT?

DYLG is categorized as Derivative Income, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for DYLG and 0.55% for PIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DYLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.