DYLD vs. TNGY
DYLD (LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF) and TNGY (Tortoise Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DYLD is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by LeaderShares, while TNGY is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Tortoise Capital. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. DYLD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for TNGY.
Performance
DYLD vs. TNGY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DYLD achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly lower than TNGY's 15.21% return.
DYLD
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 4.12%
- 3Y*
- 4.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TNGY
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- 15.21%
- 6M
- 12.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DYLD vs. TNGY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DYLD LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF | 1.00% | 2.91% |
TNGY Tortoise Energy Fund | 15.21% | 1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between DYLD and TNGY is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DYLD vs. TNGY — Risk / Return Rank
DYLD
TNGY
DYLD vs. TNGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF (DYLD) and Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DYLD | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.42 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DYLD | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 1.15 | -0.89 |
Drawdowns
DYLD vs. TNGY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DYLD drawdown since its inception was -15.03%, which is greater than TNGY's maximum drawdown of -8.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYLD and TNGY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DYLD | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.03% | -8.86% | -6.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -3.92% | +3.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.18% | -2.18% | -3.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.36% | — | — |
Volatility
DYLD vs. TNGY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DYLD | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.60% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.99% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47% | 15.70% | -13.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.39% | 15.70% | -11.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.39% | 15.70% | -11.31% |
DYLD vs. TNGY - Expense Ratio Comparison
DYLD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TNGY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
DYLD vs. TNGY - Dividend Comparison
DYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than TNGY's 3.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYLD LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF | 4.33% | 4.20% | 4.58% | 3.43% | 1.54% | 1.02% |
TNGY Tortoise Energy Fund | 3.41% | 2.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DYLD and TNGY have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DYLD is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DYLD is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TNGY.
DYLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 3.41% for TNGY.
DYLD is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while TNGY is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: LeaderShares and Tortoise Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DYLD and 0.85% for TNGY.
Find the right allocation for DYLD and TNGY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer