PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DYLD vs. TNGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DYLD vs. TNGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF (DYLD) and Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DYLD achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly lower than TNGY's 10.84% return.


DYLD

1D
0.01%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.07%
6M
1.20%
1Y
3.71%
3Y*
4.43%
5Y*
10Y*

TNGY

1D
0.92%
1M
-5.44%
YTD
10.84%
6M
11.42%
1Y
12.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DYLD vs. TNGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DYLD
LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF
1.07%2.98%
TNGY
Tortoise Energy Fund
10.84%-2.37%

Correlation

The correlation between DYLD and TNGY is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025

-0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DYLD vs. TNGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DYLD
DYLD Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
DYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
DYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
DYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

TNGY
TNGY Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
TNGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNGY Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
TNGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNGY Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DYLD vs. TNGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF (DYLD) and Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DYLDTNGYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.14

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

1.31

+1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.27

3.85

+6.42

DYLD vs. TNGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DYLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the TNGY Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DYLD and TNGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DYLD vs. TNGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DYLD drawdown since its inception was -15.03%, which is greater than TNGY's maximum drawdown of -9.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYLD and TNGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DYLDTNGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.03%

-9.79%

-5.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.32%

-9.79%

+8.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-7.56%

+7.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-3.58%

-1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

3.34%

-2.98%

Volatility

DYLD vs. TNGY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF (DYLD) is 0.48%, while Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY) has a volatility of 6.56%. This indicates that DYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DYLDTNGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.48%

6.56%

-6.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.94%

12.78%

-10.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45%

16.01%

-13.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.37%

16.44%

-12.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.37%

16.44%

-12.07%

DYLD vs. TNGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

DYLD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TNGY's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

DYLD vs. TNGY - Dividend Comparison

DYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than TNGY's 3.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DYLD
LeaderShares Dynamic Yield ETF
4.33%4.20%4.58%3.43%1.54%1.02%
TNGY
Tortoise Energy Fund
3.55%2.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DYLD and TNGY have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TNGY has higher volatility (6.56%) compared to DYLD (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYLD dropped -15.03% vs TNGY's -9.79%.

On 1-year performance, TNGY leads with 12.82% vs 3.71% for DYLD. On fees, DYLD is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TNGY has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 3.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DYLD is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TNGY.

DYLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 3.55% for TNGY.

DYLD is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while TNGY is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: LeaderShares and Tortoise Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DYLD and 0.85% for TNGY.

DYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DYLD and TNGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer