PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DYFI vs. DCMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DYFI vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (DYFI) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DYFI achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 26.32% return.


DYFI

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.10%
6M
-0.10%
YTD
0.16%
1Y
2.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DCMT

1D
-0.62%
1M
2.50%
6M
21.40%
YTD
26.32%
1Y
29.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DYFI vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DYFI
IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
0.16%3.76%-1.40%
DCMT
DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF
26.32%6.04%3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between DYFI and DCMT is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024

-0.12

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DYFI and DCMT has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.12 to -0.34, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DYFI vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DYFI
DYFI Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
DYFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DYFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
DYFI Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
DYFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
DYFI Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

DCMT
DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DYFI vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (DYFI) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DYFIDCMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.27

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

1.85

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.77

6.54

-2.77

DYFI vs. DCMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DYFI Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the DCMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DYFI and DCMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DYFI vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DYFI drawdown since its inception was -4.54%, smaller than the maximum DCMT drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DYFI and DCMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DYFIDCMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.54%

-15.96%

+11.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.49%

-15.96%

+13.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-9.33%

+8.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.38%

-3.54%

+2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

4.51%

-3.74%

Volatility

DYFI vs. DCMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (DYFI) is 0.69%, while DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) has a volatility of 5.79%. This indicates that DYFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DYFIDCMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

5.79%

-5.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.13%

16.87%

-14.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48%

18.76%

-16.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.35%

16.01%

-12.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.35%

16.01%

-12.66%

DYFI vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DYFI has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

DYFI vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison

DYFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, more than DCMT's 2.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
DCMT
DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF
2.91%3.67%1.59%
DYFI
IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
4.56%4.63%5.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


DYFI and DCMT have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DCMT has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to DYFI (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DYFI dropped -4.54% vs DCMT's -15.96%.

On 1-year performance, DCMT leads with 29.43% vs 2.89% for DYFI. On fees, DCMT is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, DYFI has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DCMT has performed better with a 29.43% return vs 2.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DCMT is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for DYFI.

DYFI has the higher dividend yield at 4.56%, compared with 2.91% for DCMT.

DYFI is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while DCMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: IDX and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 1.33% for DYFI and 0.66% for DCMT.

DCMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DYFI and DCMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer