PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DY vs. MU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DY vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DY achieves a 35.80% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 232.74% return. Over the past 10 years, DY has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 18.40%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 55.03% annualized return.


DY

1D
-1.59%
1M
7.13%
YTD
35.80%
6M
31.51%
1Y
88.82%
3Y*
61.44%
5Y*
41.13%
10Y*
18.40%

MU

1D
9.87%
1M
27.11%
YTD
232.74%
6M
284.77%
1Y
776.52%
3Y*
144.94%
5Y*
65.39%
10Y*
55.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DY vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DY
Dycom Industries, Inc.
35.80%94.13%51.24%22.96%-0.17%24.15%60.17%-12.75%-51.50%38.78%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
232.74%240.24%-0.96%71.93%-45.93%24.21%39.79%69.49%-22.84%87.59%

Correlation

The correlation between DY and MU is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 1990

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DY:

$13.94B

MU:

$1.08T

EPS

DY:

$10.52

MU:

$21.26

PE Ratio

DY:

43.60

MU:

44.66

PEG Ratio

DY:

0.61

MU:

0.17

PS Ratio

DY:

2.17

MU:

18.53

PB Ratio

DY:

7.35

MU:

14.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

DY:

$6.25B

MU:

$58.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DY:

$1.23B

MU:

$33.96B

EBITDA (TTM)

DY:

$1.07B

MU:

$25.99B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DY vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DY
DY Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DY Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DY vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DYMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-9.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.81

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

25.90

-22.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.35

100.37

-88.02

DY vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DY Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 11.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DY and MU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DYMUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

11.44

-9.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

1.24

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

1.11

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.31

-0.06

Drawdowns

DY vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DY drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, roughly equal to the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DY and MU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DYMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.54%

-98.25%

+4.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.43%

-30.28%

+5.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.58%

-57.63%

+25.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.70%

-57.63%

+23.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.01%

-57.63%

-31.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.26%

-12.07%

-2.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.66%

-58.19%

+12.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.24%

7.80%

-0.56%

Volatility

DY vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY) is 25.89%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 34.16%. This indicates that DY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DYMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.89%

34.16%

-8.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.22%

56.74%

-18.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.58%

68.70%

-23.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.52%

52.91%

-9.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.95%

49.99%

+2.96%

Dividends

DY vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

DY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DY
Dycom Industries, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.05%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%

Financials

DY vs. MU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dycom Industries, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
1.96B
23.86B
(DY) Total Revenue
(MU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DY vs. MU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Dycom Industries, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
14.0%
74.4%
Portfolio components
DY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dycom Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 275.08M and revenue of 1.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.0%.

MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.75B and revenue of 23.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.

DY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dycom Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 143.75M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.13B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.

DY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dycom Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 91.29M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 13.79B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DY and MU have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MU has higher volatility (34.16%) compared to DY (25.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DY dropped -93.54% vs MU's -98.25%.

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.44 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DY and MU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer