DXU.TO vs. VFV.TO

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

DXU.TO (Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF) and VFV.TO (Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DXU.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by Dynamic, while VFV.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. DXU.TO is actively managed, while VFV.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DXU.TO returned 14.80%/yr vs 16.05%/yr for VFV.TO. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DXU.TO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VFV.TO.

Performance

DXU.TO vs. VFV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF (DXU.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXU.TO achieves a 27.19% return, which is significantly higher than VFV.TO's 11.92% return.

DXU.TO

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 7.62%
• YTD: 27.19%
• 6M: 26.13%
• 1Y: 38.88%
• 3Y*: 27.90%
• 5Y*: 14.80%
• 10Y*: —

VFV.TO

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 11.92%
• 6M: 10.99%
• 1Y: 26.31%
• 3Y*: 23.50%
• 5Y*: 16.05%
• 10Y*: 16.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXU.TO vs. VFV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DXU.TO Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF	27.19%	9.36%	38.05%	9.43%	-14.92%	14.93%	24.17%	17.48%	12.64%	8.14%
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF	11.92%	12.18%	35.23%	23.23%	-12.58%	27.51%	15.61%	25.14%	2.95%	6.69%

Correlation

The correlation between DXU.TO and VFV.TO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2017	0.71

The correlation between DXU.TO and VFV.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.73 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DXU.TO vs. VFV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DXU.TO	VFV.TO
Industrials	34.7%	7.8%
Technology	25.3%	39.1%
Financial Services	15.5%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	8.1%	9.9%
Basic Materials	6.5%	1.7%
Healthcare	5.0%	8.3%
Communication Services	3.0%	10.7%
Energy	2.0%	3.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.5%
Real Estate	-	1.8%
Utilities	-	2.1%

Return for Risk

DXU.TO vs. VFV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXU.TO

DXU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 74
DXU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
DXU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
DXU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 71
DXU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
DXU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 77

VFV.TO

VFV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 74
VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
VFV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
VFV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 78
VFV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
VFV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXU.TO vs. VFV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF (DXU.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DXU.TO	VFV.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	2.22	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	3.02	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.41	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.27	3.07	+1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.82	11.54	+1.29

DXU.TO vs. VFV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXU.TO and VFV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DXU.TO vs. VFV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXU.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.23%, which is greater than VFV.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXU.TO and VFV.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	DXU.TO	VFV.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.23%	-27.43%	-1.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.15%	-8.62%	-0.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.80%	-19.05%	-4.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.83%	-22.19%	-2.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.32%	-1.28%	-1.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.65%	-3.34%	-3.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.04%	2.29%	+0.75%

Volatility

DXU.TO vs. VFV.TO - Volatility Comparison

Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF (DXU.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.26% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) at 4.44%. This indicates that DXU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DXU.TO	VFV.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.26%	4.44%	+4.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.69%	9.34%	+6.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.78%	11.95%	+7.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.51%	15.02%	+3.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.69%	16.61%	+3.08%

DXU.TO vs. VFV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXU.TO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VFV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

DXU.TO vs. VFV.TO - Dividend Comparison

DXU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DXU.TO Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF	0.84%	0.92%	0.99%	1.20%	1.31%	1.06%	1.33%	1.55%	1.69%	1.51%	1.65%	1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DXU.TO and VFV.TO in my portfolio?

DXU.TO and VFV.TO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DXU.TO or VFV.TO?

On fees, VFV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DXU.TO or VFV.TO?

VFV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DXU.TO.

What is the main difference between DXU.TO and VFV.TO?

DXU.TO is categorized as Dividend, while VFV.TO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Dynamic and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DXU.TO and 0.09% for VFV.TO.