DXU.TO vs. DXN.TO
DXU.TO (Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF) and DXN.TO (Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DXU.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by Dynamic, while DXN.TO is a Industrials Equities fund actively managed by Dynamic. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DXU.TO returned 13.52%/yr vs 9.42%/yr for DXN.TO. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DXU.TO vs. DXN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXU.TO achieves a 23.13% return, which is significantly higher than DXN.TO's 13.74% return.
DXU.TO
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -1.48%
- 6M
- 19.20%
- YTD
- 23.13%
- 1Y
- 29.36%
- 3Y*
- 25.20%
- 5Y*
- 13.52%
- 10Y*
- —
DXN.TO
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 12.29%
- YTD
- 13.74%
- 1Y
- 19.11%
- 3Y*
- 13.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- —
DXU.TO vs. DXN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXU.TO Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF | 23.13% | 9.36% | 38.05% | 9.43% | -14.91% | 14.93% | 14.37% |
DXN.TO Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF | 13.74% | 15.33% | 15.13% | -0.89% | -1.00% | 10.60% | -7.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXU.TO and DXN.TO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2020 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXU.TO vs. DXN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DXU.TO
DXN.TO
DXU.TO vs. DXN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF (DXU.TO) and Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF (DXN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXU.TO | DXN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.32 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 3.08 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.33 | 9.32 | 0.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXU.TO vs. DXN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXU.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.23%, smaller than the maximum DXN.TO drawdown of -34.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXU.TO and DXN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXU.TO | DXN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.23% | -34.85% | +5.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.15% | -6.50% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.80% | -14.79% | -9.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.83% | -18.55% | -6.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.44% | -1.25% | -4.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.63% | -5.74% | -0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 2.14% | +1.02% |
Volatility
DXU.TO vs. DXN.TO - Volatility Comparison
Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF (DXU.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.83% compared to Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF (DXN.TO) at 2.92%. This indicates that DXU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXU.TO | DXN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.83% | 2.92% | +2.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.07% | 8.88% | +7.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.84% | 11.16% | +8.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.58% | 12.85% | +5.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.68% | 16.67% | +3.01% |
Dividends
DXU.TO vs. DXN.TO - Dividend Comparison
DXU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DXN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXN.TO Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF | 1.98% | 2.10% | 3.26% | 2.30% | 1.21% | 0.91% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DXU.TO Dynamic Active U.S. Dividend ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXU.TO and DXN.TO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DXU.TO is categorized as Dividend, while DXN.TO is Industrials Equities.
Find the right allocation for DXU.TO and DXN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer