PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXSLX vs. RMQAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DXSLX vs. RMQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Monthly S&P 500 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXSLX) and Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXSLX achieves a 17.64% return, which is significantly lower than RMQAX's 40.14% return. Over the past 10 years, DXSLX has underperformed RMQAX with an annualized return of 27.39%, while RMQAX has yielded a comparatively higher 37.61% annualized return.


DXSLX

1D
0.22%
1M
9.76%
YTD
17.64%
6M
17.31%
1Y
46.29%
3Y*
33.41%
5Y*
17.87%
10Y*
27.39%

RMQAX

1D
0.94%
1M
21.45%
YTD
40.14%
6M
35.70%
1Y
83.47%
3Y*
51.18%
5Y*
27.34%
10Y*
37.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXSLX vs. RMQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXSLX
Direxion Monthly S&P 500 Bull 1.75X Fund
17.64%25.05%37.66%39.91%-37.35%59.07%27.52%61.52%-14.82%98.50%
RMQAX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund
40.14%33.92%44.76%115.91%-59.93%56.36%101.06%80.80%-7.28%69.80%

Correlation

The correlation between DXSLX and RMQAX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.91

The correlation between DXSLX and RMQAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXSLX vs. RMQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXSLX
DXSLX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
DXSLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXSLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXSLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
DXSLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXSLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

RMQAX
RMQAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
RMQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
RMQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXSLX vs. RMQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Monthly S&P 500 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXSLX) and Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DXSLXRMQAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.41

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

3.48

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.30

12.58

+0.72

DXSLX vs. RMQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXSLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the RMQAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXSLX and RMQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DXSLXRMQAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.70

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.60

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.81

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.75

-0.27

Drawdowns

DXSLX vs. RMQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXSLX drawdown since its inception was -91.80%, which is greater than RMQAX's maximum drawdown of -63.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXSLX and RMQAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DXSLXRMQAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.80%

-63.18%

-28.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.30%

-24.96%

+8.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.90%

-42.45%

+10.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.67%

-63.18%

+18.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.09%

-63.18%

+2.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.55%

-12.90%

-8.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

6.89%

-3.29%

Volatility

DXSLX vs. RMQAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Monthly S&P 500 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXSLX) is 4.83%, while Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX) has a volatility of 8.58%. This indicates that DXSLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DXSLXRMQAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

8.58%

-3.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.76%

24.32%

-8.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.80%

32.15%

-11.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.30%

46.19%

-14.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.60%

46.42%

-7.82%

DXSLX vs. RMQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXSLX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than RMQAX's 1.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

DXSLX vs. RMQAX - Dividend Comparison

DXSLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, less than RMQAX's 25.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DXSLX
Direxion Monthly S&P 500 Bull 1.75X Fund
6.48%7.93%10.57%0.00%0.00%7.89%2.42%4.41%7.21%34.95%0.00%25.71%
RMQAX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund
25.88%36.27%26.02%3.76%0.00%2.18%5.30%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, DXSLX and RMQAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RMQAX has higher volatility (8.58%) compared to DXSLX (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXSLX dropped -91.80% vs RMQAX's -63.18%.

RMQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXSLX and RMQAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer