PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXSLX vs. FBGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DXSLX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Monthly S&P 500 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXSLX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXSLX achieves a 17.64% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 18.56% return. Over the past 10 years, DXSLX has outperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 27.39%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively lower 21.88% annualized return.


DXSLX

1D
0.22%
1M
9.76%
YTD
17.64%
6M
17.31%
1Y
46.29%
3Y*
33.41%
5Y*
17.87%
10Y*
27.39%

FBGRX

1D
0.76%
1M
9.10%
YTD
18.56%
6M
19.76%
1Y
44.98%
3Y*
32.54%
5Y*
17.08%
10Y*
21.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXSLX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXSLX
Direxion Monthly S&P 500 Bull 1.75X Fund
17.64%25.05%37.66%39.91%-37.35%59.07%27.52%61.52%-14.82%98.50%
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
18.56%19.91%39.77%55.61%-38.45%22.64%62.20%33.43%1.02%36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between DXSLX and FBGRX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2006

0.91

The correlation between DXSLX and FBGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXSLX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXSLX
DXSLX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
DXSLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXSLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXSLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
DXSLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXSLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FBGRX
FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXSLX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Monthly S&P 500 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXSLX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DXSLXFBGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.45

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

3.67

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.30

15.56

-2.26

DXSLX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXSLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXSLX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DXSLXFBGRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.67

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.69

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.93

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.68

-0.20

Drawdowns

DXSLX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXSLX drawdown since its inception was -91.80%, which is greater than FBGRX's maximum drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXSLX and FBGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DXSLXFBGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.80%

-58.64%

-33.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.30%

-12.65%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.90%

-27.07%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.67%

-43.08%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.09%

-43.08%

-18.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.55%

-12.53%

-9.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

2.98%

+0.62%

Volatility

DXSLX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Monthly S&P 500 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXSLX) has a higher volatility of 4.83% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) at 4.14%. This indicates that DXSLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DXSLXFBGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

4.14%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.76%

13.00%

+2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.80%

17.44%

+3.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.30%

24.88%

+6.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.60%

23.69%

+14.91%

DXSLX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXSLX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

DXSLX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

DXSLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, more than FBGRX's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DXSLX
Direxion Monthly S&P 500 Bull 1.75X Fund
6.48%7.93%10.57%0.00%0.00%7.89%2.42%4.41%7.21%34.95%0.00%25.71%
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
1.60%1.90%5.95%0.93%0.57%8.73%6.40%3.70%6.32%4.23%4.05%5.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, DXSLX and FBGRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DXSLX has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to FBGRX (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXSLX dropped -91.80% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXSLX and FBGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer