DXSLX vs. FBGRX

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

DXSLX (Direxion Monthly S&P 500 Bull 1.75X Fund) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - DXSLX is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while FBGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, DXSLX returned 22.36%/yr vs 21.53%/yr for FBGRX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DXSLX charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.

Performance

DXSLX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Monthly S&P 500 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXSLX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DXSLX having a 16.15% return and FBGRX slightly lower at 16.03%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DXSLX having a 22.36% annualized return and FBGRX not far behind at 21.53%.

DXSLX

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 1.08%
• 6M: 13.42%
• YTD: 16.15%
• 1Y: 33.53%
• 3Y*: 29.22%
• 5Y*: 16.11%
• 10Y*: 22.36%

FBGRX

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: -1.88%
• 6M: 15.31%
• YTD: 16.03%
• 1Y: 31.03%
• 3Y*: 28.15%
• 5Y*: 15.32%
• 10Y*: 21.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXSLX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DXSLX Direxion Monthly S&P 500 Bull 1.75X Fund	16.15%	25.05%	37.66%	39.91%	-37.35%	59.07%	27.52%	61.52%	-14.82%	42.60%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	16.03%	19.91%	39.77%	55.61%	-38.45%	22.64%	62.20%	33.43%	1.02%	36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between DXSLX and FBGRX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2006	0.92

The correlation between DXSLX and FBGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DXSLX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXSLX

DXSLX Risk / Return Rank: 48
DXSLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
DXSLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
DXSLX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
DXSLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
DXSLX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 56
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXSLX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Monthly S&P 500 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXSLX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DXSLX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	1.63	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	2.21	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.28	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.11	2.50	-0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.97	9.84	-0.88

DXSLX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXSLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXSLX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DXSLX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXSLX drawdown since its inception was -91.80%, which is greater than FBGRX's maximum drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXSLX and FBGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DXSLX	FBGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.80%	-58.64%	-33.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.30%	-12.65%	-3.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.90%	-27.07%	-4.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.67%	-43.08%	-1.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.09%	-43.08%	-18.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.26%	-2.87%	+1.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.23%	-12.50%	-13.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.83%	3.20%	+0.63%

Volatility

DXSLX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Monthly S&P 500 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXSLX) is 6.52%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 7.59%. This indicates that DXSLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DXSLX	FBGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.52%	7.59%	-1.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.63%	15.47%	+2.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.10%	19.35%	+2.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.46%	25.18%	+6.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.62%	23.78%	+12.84%

DXSLX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXSLX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

DXSLX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

DXSLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, more than FBGRX's 1.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DXSLX Direxion Monthly S&P 500 Bull 1.75X Fund	6.56%	7.93%	10.57%	0.00%	0.00%	7.89%	2.42%	4.41%	7.21%	6.99%	0.00%	5.14%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	1.64%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DXSLX and FBGRX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, DXSLX and FBGRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DXSLX or FBGRX?

FBGRX has higher volatility (7.59%) compared to DXSLX (6.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXSLX dropped -91.80% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.