DXSL.DE vs. XDWD.DE
DXSL.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and XDWD.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - DXSL.DE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened 20-35, while XDWD.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DXSL.DE returned 11.00%/yr vs 12.83%/yr for XDWD.DE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DXSL.DE charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for XDWD.DE.
Performance
DXSL.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXSL.DE achieves a 8.84% return, which is significantly lower than XDWD.DE's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, DXSL.DE has underperformed XDWD.DE with an annualized return of 11.00%, while XDWD.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.83% annualized return.
DXSL.DE
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- 8.84%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 14.61%
- 3Y*
- 14.15%
- 5Y*
- 9.06%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
XDWD.DE
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 11.37%
- 1Y
- 23.85%
- 3Y*
- 17.56%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.83%
DXSL.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXSL.DE Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 8.84% | 15.36% | 9.82% | 24.09% | -19.61% | 29.29% | 6.12% | 36.96% | -13.91% | 17.04% |
XDWD.DE Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C | 10.91% | 7.85% | 25.98% | 20.18% | -13.67% | 32.74% | 5.48% | 31.27% | -4.94% | 7.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXSL.DE and XDWD.DE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2014 | 0.78 |
The correlation between DXSL.DE and XDWD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXSL.DE vs. XDWD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DXSL.DE
XDWD.DE
DXSL.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSL.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DXSL.DE | XDWD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.40 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 3.63 | -2.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.89 | 14.44 | -10.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DXSL.DE | XDWD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 2.14 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.90 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.84 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.78 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
DXSL.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXSL.DE drawdown since its inception was -58.54%, which is greater than XDWD.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXSL.DE and XDWD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXSL.DE | XDWD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.54% | -33.55% | -24.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.21% | -6.54% | -6.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.06% | -21.64% | +1.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.06% | -21.64% | -9.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.92% | -33.55% | -8.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.07% | -0.33% | -2.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.00% | -4.55% | -5.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.75% | 1.65% | +2.10% |
Volatility
DXSL.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSL.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE) at 2.60%. This indicates that DXSL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXSL.DE | XDWD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | 2.60% | +3.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.78% | 7.77% | +8.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.33% | 11.12% | +8.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.22% | 14.13% | +5.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.64% | 15.16% | +4.48% |
DXSL.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DXSL.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWD.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DXSL.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DXSL.DE nor XDWD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DXSL.DE and XDWD.DE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DXSL.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DXSL.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for XDWD.DE.
DXSL.DE is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XDWD.DE is Global Equities. DXSL.DE tracks MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened 20-35, while XDWD.DE tracks MSCI World. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for DXSL.DE and 0.19% for XDWD.DE.
Find the right allocation for DXSL.DE and XDWD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer