PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXSL.DE vs. SC01.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DXSL.DE vs. SC01.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSL.DE) and Invesco European Construction Sector UCITS ETF (SC01.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXSL.DE achieves a 8.84% return, which is significantly higher than SC01.DE's 0.76% return. Over the past 10 years, DXSL.DE has outperformed SC01.DE with an annualized return of 11.00%, while SC01.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.20% annualized return.


DXSL.DE

1D
0.45%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
8.84%
6M
10.88%
1Y
14.61%
3Y*
14.15%
5Y*
9.06%
10Y*
11.00%

SC01.DE

1D
0.05%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
0.76%
6M
3.12%
1Y
6.72%
3Y*
15.53%
5Y*
9.82%
10Y*
10.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXSL.DE vs. SC01.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXSL.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
8.84%15.36%9.82%24.09%-19.61%29.29%6.12%36.96%-13.91%17.04%
SC01.DE
Invesco European Construction Sector UCITS ETF
0.76%24.01%7.02%34.08%-17.94%32.21%-1.77%44.55%-20.32%10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between DXSL.DE and SC01.DE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2009

0.56

Over the past year, DXSL.DE and SC01.DE have become more correlated (0.85) than their long-term average of 0.56, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXSL.DE vs. SC01.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXSL.DE
DXSL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
DXSL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXSL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXSL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
DXSL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXSL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

SC01.DE
SC01.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
SC01.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC01.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC01.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SC01.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC01.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXSL.DE vs. SC01.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSL.DE) and Invesco European Construction Sector UCITS ETF (SC01.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DXSL.DESC01.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.07

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

0.44

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.89

1.32

+2.57

DXSL.DE vs. SC01.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXSL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is higher than the SC01.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXSL.DE and SC01.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DXSL.DESC01.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

0.33

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.50

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.61

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.65

-0.27

Drawdowns

DXSL.DE vs. SC01.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXSL.DE drawdown since its inception was -58.54%, which is greater than SC01.DE's maximum drawdown of -37.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXSL.DE and SC01.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DXSL.DESC01.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.54%

-37.00%

-21.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.21%

-15.23%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.06%

-17.02%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.06%

-28.80%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.92%

-37.00%

-4.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.07%

-6.47%

+3.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.00%

-6.93%

-3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.75%

5.10%

-1.35%

Volatility

DXSL.DE vs. SC01.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSL.DE) is 6.00%, while Invesco European Construction Sector UCITS ETF (SC01.DE) has a volatility of 6.44%. This indicates that DXSL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SC01.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DXSL.DESC01.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.00%

6.44%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.78%

16.34%

-0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.33%

20.13%

-0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.22%

20.35%

-1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.64%

25.03%

-5.39%

DXSL.DE vs. SC01.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXSL.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than SC01.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DXSL.DE vs. SC01.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DXSL.DE nor SC01.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DXSL.DE and SC01.DE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DXSL.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DXSL.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SC01.DE.

DXSL.DE tracks MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened 20-35, while SC01.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Construction & Materials. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for DXSL.DE and 0.20% for SC01.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXSL.DE and SC01.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer