PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SC01.DE vs. XDWM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SC01.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco European Construction Sector UCITS ETF (SC01.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SC01.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SC01.DE
Invesco European Construction Sector UCITS ETF
-4.05%24.01%7.02%34.08%-17.94%32.21%-1.77%44.55%-20.32%10.70%
XDWM.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C
11.13%12.88%0.02%10.77%-4.99%26.01%9.43%25.66%-13.34%13.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SC01.DE achieves a -4.05% return, which is significantly lower than XDWM.DE's 11.13% return. Over the past 10 years, SC01.DE has underperformed XDWM.DE with an annualized return of 9.91%, while XDWM.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.13% annualized return.


SC01.DE

1D
-0.73%
1M
-4.98%
YTD
-4.05%
6M
1.16%
1Y
9.10%
3Y*
14.34%
5Y*
10.44%
10Y*
9.91%

XDWM.DE

1D
-0.48%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
11.13%
6M
18.57%
1Y
24.73%
3Y*
10.17%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
11.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SC01.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SC01.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWM.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

SC01.DE vs. XDWM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SC01.DE
SC01.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SC01.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC01.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC01.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
SC01.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC01.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWM.DE
XDWM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XDWM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SC01.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Construction Sector UCITS ETF (SC01.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SC01.DEXDWM.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.45

1.33

-0.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.74

1.82

-1.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.25

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

2.20

-1.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.72

10.28

-7.56

SC01.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SC01.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the XDWM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SC01.DE and XDWM.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SC01.DEXDWM.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

1.33

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.50

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.63

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.61

+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between SC01.DE and XDWM.DE is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SC01.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SC01.DE nor XDWM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SC01.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SC01.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.00%, which is greater than XDWM.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC01.DE and XDWM.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SC01.DEXDWM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.00%

-33.91%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.23%

-13.67%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.80%

-20.77%

-8.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.00%

-33.91%

-3.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.94%

-5.94%

-5.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.95%

-5.51%

-1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.48%

2.92%

+1.56%

Volatility

SC01.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco European Construction Sector UCITS ETF (SC01.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.DE) have volatilities of 8.07% and 8.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SC01.DEXDWM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.07%

8.40%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.39%

13.76%

-0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.38%

18.54%

+1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.87%

16.59%

+3.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.94%

17.52%

+7.42%