PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXSG.DE vs. SC0Q.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DXSG.DE vs. SC0Q.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSG.DE) and Invesco European Telecoms Sector UCITS ETF (SC0Q.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXSG.DE achieves a 5.28% return, which is significantly lower than SC0Q.DE's 28.44% return. Over the past 10 years, DXSG.DE has underperformed SC0Q.DE with an annualized return of 1.87%, while SC0Q.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 3.62% annualized return.


DXSG.DE

1D
-0.08%
1M
3.09%
YTD
5.28%
6M
7.13%
1Y
-8.38%
3Y*
9.90%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
1.87%

SC0Q.DE

1D
-1.92%
1M
3.62%
YTD
28.44%
6M
31.77%
1Y
29.09%
3Y*
21.31%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
3.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXSG.DE vs. SC0Q.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXSG.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
5.28%4.40%16.70%16.80%-11.47%14.65%-12.51%5.46%-8.81%0.66%
SC0Q.DE
Invesco European Telecoms Sector UCITS ETF
28.44%18.07%18.98%5.91%-14.81%15.27%-14.17%4.16%-8.37%-0.09%

Correlation

The correlation between DXSG.DE and SC0Q.DE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2009

0.91

Over the past year, the correlation between DXSG.DE and SC0Q.DE has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXSG.DE vs. SC0Q.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXSG.DE
DXSG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
DXSG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXSG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXSG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
DXSG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXSG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

SC0Q.DE
SC0Q.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SC0Q.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC0Q.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC0Q.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SC0Q.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC0Q.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXSG.DE vs. SC0Q.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSG.DE) and Invesco European Telecoms Sector UCITS ETF (SC0Q.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DXSG.DESC0Q.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.34

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.48

3.71

-4.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.91

8.87

-9.78

DXSG.DE vs. SC0Q.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXSG.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the SC0Q.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXSG.DE and SC0Q.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DXSG.DESC0Q.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.57

1.94

-2.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.72

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

0.23

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.33

-0.16

Drawdowns

DXSG.DE vs. SC0Q.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXSG.DE drawdown since its inception was -47.38%, roughly equal to the maximum SC0Q.DE drawdown of -48.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXSG.DE and SC0Q.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DXSG.DESC0Q.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.38%

-48.95%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.28%

-7.80%

-9.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.28%

-9.73%

-7.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.23%

-21.66%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.33%

-38.17%

+0.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.16%

-2.05%

-7.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.89%

-19.11%

-0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.89%

3.14%

+5.75%

Volatility

DXSG.DE vs. SC0Q.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSG.DE) is 5.43%, while Invesco European Telecoms Sector UCITS ETF (SC0Q.DE) has a volatility of 6.36%. This indicates that DXSG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SC0Q.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DXSG.DESC0Q.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.43%

6.36%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.35%

12.07%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.82%

14.95%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.73%

14.07%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.88%

16.00%

-0.12%

DXSG.DE vs. SC0Q.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXSG.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than SC0Q.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DXSG.DE vs. SC0Q.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DXSG.DE nor SC0Q.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DXSG.DE and SC0Q.DE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DXSG.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DXSG.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SC0Q.DE.

DXSG.DE tracks MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened 20-35, while SC0Q.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Telecommunications. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for DXSG.DE and 0.20% for SC0Q.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXSG.DE and SC0Q.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer