DXSE.DE vs. XDG3.DE
DXSE.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and XDG3.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds from Xtrackers - DXSE.DE tracks the MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened 20-35 while XDG3.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being Select. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DXSE.DE returned 2.51%/yr vs 1.94%/yr for XDG3.DE. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DXSE.DE charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XDG3.DE.
Performance
DXSE.DE vs. XDG3.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXSE.DE achieves a -1.95% return, which is significantly higher than XDG3.DE's -6.02% return.
DXSE.DE
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- -1.95%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 4.80%
- 3Y*
- 2.51%
- 5Y*
- 5.38%
- 10Y*
- 6.10%
XDG3.DE
- 1D
- 2.88%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- -6.02%
- 6M
- -6.40%
- 1Y
- 2.34%
- 3Y*
- 1.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DXSE.DE vs. XDG3.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DXSE.DE Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | -1.95% | 4.97% | 4.52% | 7.97% |
XDG3.DE Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C | -6.02% | 1.47% | 9.58% | 2.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXSE.DE and XDG3.DE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2023 | 0.68 |
The correlation between DXSE.DE and XDG3.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXSE.DE vs. XDG3.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DXSE.DE
XDG3.DE
DXSE.DE vs. XDG3.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSE.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C (XDG3.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DXSE.DE | XDG3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.04 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 0.17 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.82 | 0.44 | +0.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DXSE.DE | XDG3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 0.16 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.16 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
DXSE.DE vs. XDG3.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXSE.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.30%, which is greater than XDG3.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXSE.DE and XDG3.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXSE.DE | XDG3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.30% | -20.49% | -13.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.67% | -13.31% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.10% | -20.49% | -7.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.88% | -11.91% | -1.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.34% | -5.57% | -2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.81% | 5.29% | +0.52% |
Volatility
DXSE.DE vs. XDG3.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (DXSE.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.82% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C (XDG3.DE) at 4.95%. This indicates that DXSE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDG3.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXSE.DE | XDG3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.82% | 4.95% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.95% | 10.56% | +1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.63% | 14.57% | +3.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.48% | 13.31% | +3.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 13.31% | +2.73% |
DXSE.DE vs. XDG3.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DXSE.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than XDG3.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
DXSE.DE vs. XDG3.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DXSE.DE nor XDG3.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DXSE.DE and XDG3.DE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DXSE.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DXSE.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XDG3.DE.
DXSE.DE tracks MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened 20-35, while XDG3.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being Select. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for DXSE.DE and 0.35% for XDG3.DE.
Find the right allocation for DXSE.DE and XDG3.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer