PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXQLX vs. RYNVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DXQLX vs. RYNVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX) and Rydex Nova Fund (RYNVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXQLX achieves a 35.36% return, which is significantly higher than RYNVX's 16.00% return. Over the past 10 years, DXQLX has outperformed RYNVX with an annualized return of 35.37%, while RYNVX has yielded a comparatively lower 19.11% annualized return.


DXQLX

1D
0.81%
1M
18.74%
YTD
35.36%
6M
31.80%
1Y
71.91%
3Y*
44.83%
5Y*
23.91%
10Y*
35.37%

RYNVX

1D
0.19%
1M
8.56%
YTD
16.00%
6M
15.59%
1Y
40.33%
3Y*
29.53%
5Y*
16.53%
10Y*
19.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXQLX vs. RYNVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXQLX
Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund
35.36%29.99%39.26%97.59%-57.72%55.98%100.94%79.36%-81.54%743.06%
RYNVX
Rydex Nova Fund
16.00%21.42%33.14%35.31%-29.96%42.56%19.64%45.58%-10.24%31.17%

Correlation

The correlation between DXQLX and RYNVX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2006

0.88

The correlation between DXQLX and RYNVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXQLX vs. RYNVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXQLX
DXQLX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
DXQLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXQLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXQLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
DXQLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXQLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

RYNVX
RYNVX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
RYNVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYNVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYNVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
RYNVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYNVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXQLX vs. RYNVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX) and Rydex Nova Fund (RYNVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DXQLXRYNVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.41

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

3.02

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.47

13.53

-1.05

DXQLX vs. RYNVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXQLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the RYNVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXQLX and RYNVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DXQLXRYNVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

2.35

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.64

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.70

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.41

-0.30

Drawdowns

DXQLX vs. RYNVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXQLX drawdown since its inception was -96.04%, which is greater than RYNVX's maximum drawdown of -76.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXQLX and RYNVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DXQLXRYNVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.04%

-76.54%

-19.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.88%

-13.84%

-8.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.99%

-27.49%

-10.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.79%

-40.92%

-19.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.23%

-48.58%

-38.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.61%

-19.62%

-31.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.97%

3.08%

+2.89%

Volatility

DXQLX vs. RYNVX - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX) has a higher volatility of 7.58% compared to Rydex Nova Fund (RYNVX) at 4.26%. This indicates that DXQLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYNVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DXQLXRYNVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.58%

4.26%

+3.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.24%

13.46%

+7.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.08%

17.79%

+10.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.14%

25.95%

+16.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

138.65%

27.39%

+111.26%

DXQLX vs. RYNVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXQLX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than RYNVX's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

DXQLX vs. RYNVX - Dividend Comparison

DXQLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.93%, more than RYNVX's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DXQLX
Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund
10.93%14.50%0.33%0.00%0.00%11.75%10.90%3.37%7.37%5.72%0.00%0.00%
RYNVX
Rydex Nova Fund
0.65%0.76%0.66%0.59%22.11%9.07%0.53%0.00%0.00%1.97%1.22%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, DXQLX and RYNVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DXQLX has higher volatility (7.58%) compared to RYNVX (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXQLX dropped -96.04% vs RYNVX's -76.54%.

DXQLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXQLX and RYNVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer