DXQ.TO vs. INTY.TO
DXQ.TO (Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF) and INTY.TO (Evolve International Equity UltraYield ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. DXQ.TO is actively managed, while INTY.TO is passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DXQ.TO charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for INTY.TO.
Performance
DXQ.TO vs. INTY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DXQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- 6.80%
- 6M
- 5.77%
- 1Y
- 19.04%
- 3Y*
- 17.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTY.TO
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DXQ.TO vs. INTY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DXQ.TO Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF | 3.91% |
INTY.TO Evolve International Equity UltraYield ETF | -3.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXQ.TO and INTY.TO is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2026 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXQ.TO vs. INTY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DXQ.TO
INTY.TO
DXQ.TO vs. INTY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF (DXQ.TO) and Evolve International Equity UltraYield ETF (INTY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DXQ.TO | INTY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.74 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.46 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DXQ.TO | INTY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.61 | -0.37 | +1.98 |
Drawdowns
DXQ.TO vs. INTY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.54%, which is greater than INTY.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXQ.TO and INTY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXQ.TO | INTY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.54% | -11.06% | -4.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -5.97% | +5.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.27% | -6.00% | +4.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | — | — |
Volatility
DXQ.TO vs. INTY.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXQ.TO | INTY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.38% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.21% | 24.63% | -15.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.92% | 24.63% | -13.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.92% | 24.63% | -13.71% |
DXQ.TO vs. INTY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DXQ.TO has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than INTY.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
DXQ.TO vs. INTY.TO - Dividend Comparison
DXQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.77%, less than INTY.TO's 10.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXQ.TO Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF | 7.77% | 7.45% | 5.74% | 6.54% | 1.83% |
INTY.TO Evolve International Equity UltraYield ETF | 10.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXQ.TO and INTY.TO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, INTY.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
INTY.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for DXQ.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Dynamic and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for DXQ.TO and 0.60% for INTY.TO.
Find the right allocation for DXQ.TO and INTY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer